It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHCT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHCT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHCT (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -0.82% price change this week, while UHT (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -6.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.41%.
CHCT is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.
UHT is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| CHCT | UHT | CHCT / UHT | |
| Capitalization | 449M | 550M | 82% |
| EBITDA | 63.6M | 68.1M | 93% |
| Gain YTD | -7.676 | 12.496 | -61% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.67 | 30.74 | 142% |
| Revenue | 120M | 99.4M | 121% |
| Total Cash | 3.38M | 6.92M | 49% |
| Total Debt | 534M | 387M | 138% |
CHCT | UHT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHCT's Valuation (4) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (14). This means that CHCT’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.
CHCT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (100). This means that CHCT’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.
UHT's SMR Rating (69) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CHCT (91). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to CHCT’s over the last 12 months.
CHCT's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (55). This means that CHCT’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.
UHT's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHCT (98). This means that UHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHCT’s over the last 12 months.
| CHCT | UHT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 49% | 16 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 44% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VDMRX | 10.55 | 0.04 | +0.38% |
| Virtus KAR Developing Markets R6 | |||
| CGACX | 12.93 | 0.03 | +0.23% |
| Calvert Global Energy Solutions C | |||
| NBMVX | 51.86 | 0.12 | +0.23% |
| Neuberger Small Cap Growth Adv | |||
| FEYTX | 31.36 | 0.07 | +0.22% |
| Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% M | |||
| FGFCX | 40.46 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes International Leaders C | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHCT has been loosely correlated with UHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHCT jumps, then UHT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHCT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHCT | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| UHT - CHCT | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| GMRE - CHCT | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| ALEX - CHCT | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| LTC - CHCT | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| SILA - CHCT | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHT has been closely correlated with LXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHT jumps, then LXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UHT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UHT | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| LXP - UHT | 67% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| BFS - UHT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| PLYM - UHT | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| EGP - UHT | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| STAG - UHT | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||