It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHCT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLTC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHCT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHCT (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +1.35% price change this week, while LTC (@Managed Health Care) price change was -1.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.44%.
CHCT is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.
LTC is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
| CHCT | LTC | CHCT / LTC | |
| Capitalization | 448M | 1.7B | 26% |
| EBITDA | 63.6M | 160M | 40% |
| Gain YTD | -7.676 | 9.664 | -79% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.67 | 49.50 | 88% |
| Revenue | 120M | 218M | 55% |
| Total Cash | 2K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 534M | 696M | 77% |
CHCT | LTC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHCT's Valuation (3) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LTC (5). This means that CHCT’s stock grew similarly to LTC’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHCT (100). This means that LTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHCT’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's SMR Rating (74) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CHCT (91). This means that LTC’s stock grew similarly to CHCT’s over the last 12 months.
CHCT's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LTC (52). This means that CHCT’s stock grew similarly to LTC’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHCT (97). This means that LTC’s stock grew significantly faster than CHCT’s over the last 12 months.
| CHCT | LTC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 7 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 50% | 7 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 47% | 7 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 49% | 9 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 63% | 15 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 39% | 7 days ago 33% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHCT has been loosely correlated with GMRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHCT jumps, then GMRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHCT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHCT | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| GMRE - CHCT | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| UHT - CHCT | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| ALEX - CHCT | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| LTC - CHCT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| DOC - CHCT | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTC has been closely correlated with NHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LTC jumps, then NHI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTC | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| NHI - LTC | 78% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| SBRA - LTC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| OHI - LTC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| CTRE - LTC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| WELL - LTC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||