CHCI
Price
$18.56
Change
+$0.46 (+2.54%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
186.93M
FRPH
Price
$25.47
Change
-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
486.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHCI vs FRPH

Header iconCHCI vs FRPH Comparison
Open Charts CHCI vs FRPHBanner chart's image
Comstock Holding Companies
Price$18.56
Change+$0.46 (+2.54%)
Volume$37.68K
Capitalization186.93M
FRP Holdings
Price$25.47
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$36.53K
Capitalization486.71M
CHCI vs FRPH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHCI vs. FRPH commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHCI is a StrongBuy and FRPH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CHCI: $18.56 vs. FRPH: $25.47)
Brand notoriety: CHCI and FRPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHCI: 145% vs. FRPH: 89%
Market capitalization -- CHCI: $186.93M vs. FRPH: $486.71M
CHCI [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $186.93M. FRPH’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $486.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHCI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFRPH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHCI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FRPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHCI is a better buy in the long-term than FRPH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHCI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRPH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FRPH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHCI is a better buy in the short-term than FRPH.

Price Growth

CHCI (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +16.95% price change this week, while FRPH (@Real Estate Development) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.87% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRPH($487M) has a higher market cap than CHCI($187M). FRPH has higher P/E ratio than CHCI: FRPH (90.96) vs CHCI (12.21). CHCI YTD gains are higher at: 129.703 vs. FRPH (-16.846). FRPH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.5M vs. CHCI (11.7M). FRPH has more cash in the bank: 153M vs. CHCI (30.5M). CHCI has less debt than FRPH: CHCI (5.82M) vs FRPH (180M). CHCI has higher revenues than FRPH: CHCI (55.5M) vs FRPH (42.3M).
CHCIFRPHCHCI / FRPH
Capitalization187M487M38%
EBITDA11.7M20.5M57%
Gain YTD129.703-16.846-770%
P/E Ratio12.2190.9613%
Revenue55.5M42.3M131%
Total Cash30.5M153M20%
Total Debt5.82M180M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHCI vs FRPH: Fundamental Ratings
CHCI
FRPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1464
SMR RATING
1..100
2991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3578
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2226
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHCI's Valuation (75) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as FRPH (88) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CHCI’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

CHCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRPH (64) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CHCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

CHCI's SMR Rating (29) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRPH (91) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CHCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

CHCI's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRPH (78) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CHCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

CHCI's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as FRPH (26) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CHCI’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHCIFRPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VONOY15.590.39
+2.57%
VONOVIA SE
IBJHF2.06N/A
N/A
Ibstock PLC
VMTG0.03N/A
N/A
Victor Mining Industry Group Inc.
YMZBY180.00N/A
N/A
Yamazaki Baking Co. Ltd.
ABBB8.67N/A
N/A
Auburn Bancorp, Inc.

CHCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHCI and DUO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHCI and DUO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHCI
1D Price
Change %
CHCI100%
+2.54%
DUO - CHCI
21%
Poorly correlated
+32.82%
BEKE - CHCI
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
MAYS - CHCI
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JLL - CHCI
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
FRPH - CHCI
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More

FRPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRPH has been loosely correlated with MMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRPH jumps, then MMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRPH
1D Price
Change %
FRPH100%
-0.12%
MMI - FRPH
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
KW - FRPH
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
CWK - FRPH
48%
Loosely correlated
+4.60%
NMRK - FRPH
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.57%
RMR - FRPH
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More