CHBAF
Price
$8.01
Change
-$0.49 (-5.76%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.25B
SOBS
Price
$28.98
Change
-$0.12 (-0.41%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
73.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHBAF vs SOBS

Header iconCHBAF vs SOBS Comparison
Open Charts CHBAF vs SOBSBanner chart's image
Chiba Bank, Ltd. (The)
Price$8.01
Change-$0.49 (-5.76%)
Volume$112
Capitalization7.25B
Solvay Bank (NY)
Price$28.98
Change-$0.12 (-0.41%)
Volume$270
Capitalization73.47M
CHBAF vs SOBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHBAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHBAF vs. SOBS commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHBAF is a Hold and SOBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CHBAF: $8.01 vs. SOBS: $28.98)
Brand notoriety: CHBAF and SOBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHBAF: 100% vs. SOBS: 35%
Market capitalization -- CHBAF: $7.25B vs. SOBS: $73.47M
CHBAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.25B. SOBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $73.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHBAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHBAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SOBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHBAF is a better buy in the long-term than SOBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHBAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHBAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SOBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SOBS is a better buy in the short-term than CHBAF.

Price Growth

CHBAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHBAF($7.25B) has a higher market cap than SOBS($73.5M). SOBS has higher P/E ratio than CHBAF: SOBS (16.19) vs CHBAF (13.52). SOBS YTD gains are higher at: 14.804 vs. CHBAF (0.000).
CHBAFSOBSCHBAF / SOBS
Capitalization7.25B73.5M9,868%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00014.804-
P/E Ratio13.5216.1984%
Revenue257BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.62TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHBAF vs SOBS: Fundamental Ratings
CHBAF
SOBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4192
SMR RATING
1..100
188
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
397
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOBS's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBAF (58). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to CHBAF’s over the last 12 months.

CHBAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOBS (92). This means that CHBAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

CHBAF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOBS (88). This means that CHBAF’s stock grew significantly faster than SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBAF (73). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to CHBAF’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBAF (39). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to CHBAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHBAFSOBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHBAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLP20.810.73
+3.64%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Tesla ETF
VAW208.161.84
+0.89%
Vanguard Materials ETF
QLTI25.390.18
+0.73%
GMO International Quality ETF
SNOV24.390.04
+0.17%
FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Nov
USDX25.70-0.01
-0.04%
SGI Enhanced Core ETF

CHBAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHBAF and BKHPF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHBAF and BKHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHBAF
1D Price
Change %
CHBAF100%
N/A
BKHPF - CHBAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLQC - CHBAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBSDF - CHBAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.54%
CPKF - CHBAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KPCUF - CHBAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SOBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOBS and CHBAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOBS and CHBAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOBS
1D Price
Change %
SOBS100%
N/A
CHBAF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDGSF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRNN - SOBS
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - SOBS
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLRK - SOBS
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
More