CHBAF
Price
$8.01
Change
-$0.49 (-5.76%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.47B
DNBBF
Price
$26.55
Change
-$0.09 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
38.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHBAF vs DNBBF

Header iconCHBAF vs DNBBF Comparison
Open Charts CHBAF vs DNBBFBanner chart's image
Chiba Bank, Ltd. (The)
Price$8.01
Change-$0.49 (-5.76%)
Volume$112
Capitalization7.47B
DNB NOR BANK ASA
Price$26.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.34%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization38.88B
CHBAF vs DNBBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHBAF vs. DNBBF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHBAF is a Buy and DNBBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CHBAF: $8.01 vs. DNBBF: $26.55)
Brand notoriety: CHBAF and DNBBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHBAF: 100% vs. DNBBF: 56%
Market capitalization -- CHBAF: $7.47B vs. DNBBF: $38.88B
CHBAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.47B. DNBBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $38.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHBAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDNBBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHBAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DNBBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNBBF is a better buy in the long-term than CHBAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNBBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DNBBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CHBAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DNBBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNBBF($38.9B) has a higher market cap than CHBAF($7.47B). CHBAF has higher P/E ratio than DNBBF: CHBAF (13.52) vs DNBBF (9.06). DNBBF YTD gains are higher at: 28.410 vs. CHBAF (0.000). DNBBF has less debt than CHBAF: DNBBF (1.04T) vs CHBAF (3.11T). CHBAF has higher revenues than DNBBF: CHBAF (251B) vs DNBBF (87.3B).
CHBAFDNBBFCHBAF / DNBBF
Capitalization7.47B38.9B19%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00028.410-
P/E Ratio13.529.06149%
Revenue251B87.3B288%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.11T1.04T301%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHBAF vs DNBBF: Fundamental Ratings
CHBAF
DNBBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4040
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4041
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHBAF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNBBF (97). This means that CHBAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNBBF’s over the last 12 months.

CHBAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as DNBBF (40). This means that CHBAF’s stock grew similarly to DNBBF’s over the last 12 months.

CHBAF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as DNBBF (1). This means that CHBAF’s stock grew similarly to DNBBF’s over the last 12 months.

DNBBF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBAF (56). This means that DNBBF’s stock grew similarly to CHBAF’s over the last 12 months.

CHBAF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as DNBBF (41). This means that CHBAF’s stock grew similarly to DNBBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHBAFDNBBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VUSB49.840.02
+0.04%
Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
APRH24.99N/A
-0.02%
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Apr
XJUN41.70-0.02
-0.05%
FT Vest US Eq Enh&Mod Bffr ETF June
KSPY27.43-0.08
-0.28%
KraneShares Hedgeye Hedged Eq Idx ETF
GUG15.60-0.06
-0.39%
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund

CHBAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHBAF and BKHPF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHBAF and BKHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHBAF
1D Price
Change %
CHBAF100%
N/A
BKHPF - CHBAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLQC - CHBAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBSDF - CHBAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
CPKF - CHBAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KPCUF - CHBAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DNBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNBBF has been loosely correlated with DNBBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNBBF jumps, then DNBBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNBBF
1D Price
Change %
DNBBF100%
-0.35%
DNBBY - DNBBF
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
DBSDF - DNBBF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
SWDBY - DNBBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
CHBAF - DNBBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKHPF - DNBBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More