CHA
Price
$11.16
Change
+$0.12 (+1.09%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.05B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CMG
Price
$39.63
Change
+$0.46 (+1.17%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
51.79B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHA vs CMG

Header iconCHA vs CMG Comparison
Open Charts CHA vs CMGBanner chart's image
Chagee Holdings
Price$11.16
Change+$0.12 (+1.09%)
Volume$1.39K
Capitalization2.05B
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$39.63
Change+$0.46 (+1.17%)
Volume$13.84K
Capitalization51.79B
CHA vs CMG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHA vs. CMG commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHA is a Buy and CMG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CHA: $11.04 vs. CMG: $39.17)
Brand notoriety: CHA: Not notable vs. CMG: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHA: 89% vs. CMG: 229%
Market capitalization -- CHA: $2.05B vs. CMG: $51.79B
CHA [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.05B. CMG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $51.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $227.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the long-term than CHA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the short-term than CHA.

Price Growth

CHA (@Restaurants) experienced а -9.36% price change this week, while CMG (@Restaurants) price change was -1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.47% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($51.8B) has a higher market cap than CHA($2.05B). CMG has higher P/E ratio than CHA: CMG (34.66) vs CHA (18.49). CMG YTD gains are higher at: 5.865 vs. CHA (-5.073). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.35B vs. CHA (2.03B). CHA has higher revenues than CMG: CHA (13.3B) vs CMG (11.8B).
CHACMGCHA / CMG
Capitalization2.05B51.8B4%
EBITDA2.03B2.35B86%
Gain YTD-5.0735.865-86%
P/E Ratio18.4934.6653%
Revenue13.3B11.8B113%
Total CashN/A1.42B-
Total DebtN/A4.98B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHA vs CMG: Fundamental Ratings
CHA
CMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6772
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
5521
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5287
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMG's Valuation (85) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CHA (89) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to CHA’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CHA (100) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to CHA’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHA (55) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHA’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CHA (86) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to CHA’s over the last 12 months.

CHA's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (87) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHACMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIRR115.432.91
+2.59%
First Trust RBA Amer Indl RenaisTM ETF
GGT4.250.05
+1.19%
THE Gabelli Multimedia Trust
HYBL28.31-0.07
-0.25%
State Street® Blackstone High Income ETF
AEMS10.64-0.08
-0.70%
Anfield Enhanced Market ETF
XPP26.55-0.62
-2.28%
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

CHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHA and VSTD have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHA and VSTD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHA
1D Price
Change %
CHA100%
-3.83%
VSTD - CHA
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BH - CHA
18%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
CMG - CHA
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
BDL - CHA
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
BJRI - CHA
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
More

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
+1.71%
FRSH - CMG
61%
Loosely correlated
-10.60%
SG - CMG
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
CAVA - CMG
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
KRUS - CMG
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.62%
WING - CMG
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.02%
More