CGXYY
Price
$26.50
Change
+$3.87 (+17.10%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
14.46B
CIIHF
Price
$3.03
Change
+$0.48 (+18.82%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
46.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGXYY vs CIIHF

Header iconCGXYY vs CIIHF Comparison
Open Charts CGXYY vs CIIHFBanner chart's image
China Galaxy Securities
Price$26.50
Change+$3.87 (+17.10%)
Volume$105
Capitalization14.46B
Citic Securities
Price$3.03
Change+$0.48 (+18.82%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization46.09B
CGXYY vs CIIHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGXYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGXYY vs. CIIHF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXYY is a Hold and CIIHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CGXYY: $26.50 vs. CIIHF: $3.03)
Brand notoriety: CGXYY and CIIHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGXYY: 77% vs. CIIHF: 54%
Market capitalization -- CGXYY: $14.46B vs. CIIHF: $46.09B
CGXYY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $14.46B. CIIHF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $46.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGXYY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileCIIHF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CGXYY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • CIIHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CGXYY and CIIHF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGXYY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIIHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGXYY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CIIHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGXYY is a better buy in the short-term than CIIHF.

Price Growth

CGXYY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIIHF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +6.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +114.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+6.16% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIIHF($46.1B) has a higher market cap than CGXYY($14.5B). CGXYY has higher P/E ratio than CIIHF: CGXYY (131.58) vs CIIHF (8.61). CGXYY YTD gains are higher at: 19.369 vs. CIIHF (13.598). CIIHF has higher revenues than CGXYY: CIIHF (64.5B) vs CGXYY (18.6B).
CGXYYCIIHFCGXYY / CIIHF
Capitalization14.5B46.1B31%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.36913.598142%
P/E Ratio131.588.611,528%
Revenue18.6B64.5B29%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A201B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGXYY vs CIIHF: Fundamental Ratings
CGXYY
CIIHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
845
SMR RATING
1..100
712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1811
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIIHF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as CGXYY (26). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to CGXYY’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIIHF (45). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIIHF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CIIHF (12). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew similarly to CIIHF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CIIHF (41). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew similarly to CIIHF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as CGXYY (18). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to CGXYY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGXYYCIIHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
5%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
5%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGXYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VBIX4.290.30
+7.44%
Viewbix Inc.
WGS91.611.82
+2.03%
GeneDx Holdings Corp
CIM14.340.10
+0.70%
Chimera Investment Corp
BNS55.350.22
+0.40%
Bank of Nova Scotia
RYN23.10-0.07
-0.30%
Rayonier

CGXYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGXYY and BTBT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGXYY and BTBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGXYY
1D Price
Change %
CGXYY100%
N/A
BTBT - CGXYY
21%
Poorly correlated
+11.79%
BTCWF - CGXYY
6%
Poorly correlated
+9.74%
CIIHF - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLVDF - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCORF - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
More

CIIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHF and GS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHF and GS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIIHF
1D Price
Change %
CIIHF100%
N/A
GS - CIIHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
HAFG - CIIHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCO - CIIHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
PIPR - CIIHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
MS - CIIHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More