Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs UMMA
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs UMMA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$26.35
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Volume$548.35K
Net Assets3.66B
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$25.54
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$200
Net Assets132.24M
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. UMMA commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Buy and UMMA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.66B vs. UMMA (132M). UMMA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: UMMA (8.426) vs CGXU (7.013). CGXU was incepted earlier than UMMA: CGXU (3 years) vs UMMA (3 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than UMMA (0.65). CGXU has a higher turnover UMMA (11.00) vs UMMA (11.00).
| CGXU | UMMA | CGXU / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 7.013 | 8.426 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 132M | 2,769% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 11.00 | 327% |
| Yield | 1.01 | 0.89 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 84% | 19 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 72% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 68% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| RIO - CGXU | 67% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| SE - CGXU | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 68% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| RIO - UMMA | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||