Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs UMMA
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs UMMA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$29.75
Change-$1.04 (-3.38%)
Volume$633.65K
Net Assets4.33B
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$29.74
Change+$0.20 (+0.68%)
Volume$32.41K
Net Assets182.17M
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. UMMA commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and UMMA is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 4.33B vs. UMMA (182M). UMMA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: UMMA (27.202) vs CGXU (21.904). CGXU was incepted earlier than UMMA: CGXU (4 years) vs UMMA (4 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than UMMA (0.65). CGXU has a higher turnover UMMA (15.00) vs UMMA (15.00).
| CGXU | UMMA | CGXU / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 21.904 | 27.202 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 4.33B | 182M | 2,377% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 15.00 | 353% |
| Yield | 1.30 | 1.06 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -3.38% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 75% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 68% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 77% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 70% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| CRH - UMMA | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||