| CGXU | UMMA | CGXU / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 4.805 | 6.491 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 4.67B | 198M | 2,359% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 15.00 | 353% |
| Yield | 5.30 | 1.02 | 518% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
| CGXU | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 9 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BCAT | 14.78 | 0.09 | +0.61% |
| BlackRock Capital Allocation Term Trust | |||
| EASG | 36.36 | 0.12 | +0.32% |
| Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Eq ETF | |||
| MMD | 15.22 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
| NYLI MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund | |||
| BDBT | 25.50 | -0.04 | -0.14% |
| Bluemonte Core Bond ETF | |||
| XBTY | 11.15 | -0.12 | -1.07% |
| GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 75% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 68% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.37% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 77% Closely correlated | +4.44% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 70% Closely correlated | +5.37% | ||
| CRH - UMMA | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||