Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs UMMA
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs UMMA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$27.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
Volume$238.43K
Net Assets3.78B
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$26.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.34K
Net Assets137.26M
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. UMMA commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Buy and UMMA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.78B vs. UMMA (137M). UMMA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: UMMA (13.551) vs CGXU (11.496). CGXU was incepted earlier than UMMA: CGXU (3 years) vs UMMA (4 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than UMMA (0.65). CGXU has a higher turnover UMMA (11.00) vs UMMA (11.00).
| CGXU | UMMA | CGXU / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 11.496 | 13.551 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 3.78B | 137M | 2,758% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 11.00 | 327% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 0.82 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | 17 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 72% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.31% | ||
| RIO - CGXU | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| SE - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 68% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| RIO - UMMA | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
More | ||||