Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs UMMA
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs UMMA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$29.36
Change+$0.15 (+0.51%)
Volume$500
Net Assets4.09B
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$27.14
Change-$0.12 (-0.44%)
Volume$28.7K
Net Assets157.56M
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. UMMA commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and UMMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 4.09B vs. UMMA (158M). CGXU has a higher annual dividend yield than UMMA: CGXU (20.285) vs UMMA (16.069). CGXU was incepted earlier than UMMA: CGXU (4 years) vs UMMA (4 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than UMMA (0.65). CGXU has a higher turnover UMMA (11.00) vs UMMA (11.00).
| CGXU | UMMA | CGXU / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 20.285 | 16.069 | 126% |
| Net Assets | 4.09B | 158M | 2,591% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 11.00 | 482% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 0.83 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 75% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 69% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 74% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 66% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| CRH - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| SAN - UMMA | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||