Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs OSEA
CGXU vs OSEA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs OSEA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$29.34
Change+$0.14 (+0.48%)
Volume$1.25K
Net Assets4.12B
Harbor International Compounders ETF
Price$29.02
Change-$0.16 (-0.55%)
Volume$86.53K
Net Assets501.05M
CGXU vs OSEA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. OSEA commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and OSEA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 4.13B vs. OSEA (501M). CGXU has a higher annual dividend yield than OSEA: CGXU (19.650) vs OSEA (12.262). CGXU was incepted earlier than OSEA: CGXU (4 years) vs OSEA (3 years). CGXU (0.54) and OSEA (0.55) have comparable expense ratios . CGXU has a higher turnover OSEA (3.00) vs OSEA (3.00).
| CGXU | OSEA | CGXU / OSEA | |
| Gain YTD | 19.650 | 12.262 | 160% |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 501M | 823% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.55 | 98% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 3.00 | 1,767% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 0.46 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 75% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 69% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
More | ||||
OSEA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSEA has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSEA jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSEA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSEA | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| SAP - OSEA | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| ASML - OSEA | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| LIN - OSEA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| TSM - OSEA | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| AZN - OSEA | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
More | ||||