Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs OSEA
CGXU vs OSEA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs OSEA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$26.55
Change-$0.34 (-1.26%)
Volume$304.74K
Net Assets3.69B
Harbor International Compounders ETF
Price$28.94
Change-$0.48 (-1.63%)
Volume$54.34K
Net Assets469.03M
CGXU vs OSEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. OSEA commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and OSEA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.69B vs. OSEA (469M). OSEA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: OSEA (11.959) vs CGXU (7.621). CGXU was incepted earlier than OSEA: CGXU (3 years) vs OSEA (3 years). CGXU (0.54) and OSEA (0.55) have comparable expense ratios . CGXU has a higher turnover OSEA (3.00) vs OSEA (3.00).
| CGXU | OSEA | CGXU / OSEA | |
| Gain YTD | 7.621 | 11.959 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 469M | 787% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.55 | 98% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 3.00 | 1,200% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 0.46 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 26 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 72% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 68% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| RIO - CGXU | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| SE - CGXU | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
OSEA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OSEA and ASML have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSEA and ASML's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSEA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSEA | 100% | -1.63% | ||
| ASML - OSEA | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.21% | ||
| SAP - OSEA | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
| TSM - OSEA | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| HDB - OSEA | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.57% | ||
| FERG - OSEA | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||