Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs OSEA
CGXU vs OSEA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs OSEA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$27.53
Change-$0.06 (-0.22%)
Volume$454.74K
Net Assets3.79B
Harbor International Compounders ETF
Price$29.66
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
Volume$15.57K
Net Assets487.47M
CGXU vs OSEA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. OSEA commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and OSEA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.8B vs. OSEA (487M). OSEA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: OSEA (14.720) vs CGXU (12.807). CGXU was incepted earlier than OSEA: CGXU (3 years) vs OSEA (3 years). CGXU (0.54) and OSEA (0.55) have comparable expense ratios . CGXU has a higher turnover OSEA (3.00) vs OSEA (3.00).
| CGXU | OSEA | CGXU / OSEA | |
| Gain YTD | 12.807 | 14.720 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 3.8B | 487M | 779% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.55 | 98% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 3.00 | 1,200% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 0.45 | 316% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 72% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 66% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
| RIO - CGXU | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| SE - CGXU | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||
OSEA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OSEA and ASML have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSEA and ASML's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSEA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSEA | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| ASML - OSEA | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.91% | ||
| SAP - OSEA | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| TSM - OSEA | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.66% | ||
| HDB - OSEA | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
| FERG - OSEA | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||