Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs IPOS
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs IPOS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$31.56
Change+$1.32 (+4.37%)
Volume$1.31M
Net Assets4.81B
Renaissance International IPO ETF
Price$18.73
Change+$1.33 (+7.64%)
Volume$2.04K
Net Assets5.69M
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. IPOS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and IPOS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 4.81B vs. IPOS (5.69M). IPOS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: IPOS (10.874) vs CGXU (6.802). CGXU was incepted earlier than IPOS: CGXU (4 years) vs IPOS (11 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than IPOS (0.80). IPOS has a higher turnover CGXU (53.00) vs CGXU (53.00).
| CGXU | IPOS | CGXU / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.802 | 10.874 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 4.81B | 5.69M | 84,457% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 68.00 | 78% |
| Yield | 5.00 | 0.91 | 548% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 81% | 22 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 75% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 68% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.51% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.80% | ||
More | ||||
IPOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and SPG have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and SPG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| SPG - IPOS | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| BPPTU - IPOS | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +4.03% | ||
| CRC - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.61% | ||
More | ||||