Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs IPOS
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs IPOS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$28.22
Change+$0.13 (+0.46%)
Volume$494.59K
Net Assets3.92B
Renaissance International IPO ETF
Price$16.65
Change+$0.38 (+2.34%)
Volume$1.28K
Net Assets5.01M
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. IPOS commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a StrongBuy and IPOS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.92B vs. IPOS (5.01M). IPOS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: IPOS (37.672) vs CGXU (15.635). CGXU was incepted earlier than IPOS: CGXU (4 years) vs IPOS (11 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than IPOS (0.80). IPOS has a higher turnover CGXU (53.00) vs CGXU (53.00).
| CGXU | IPOS | CGXU / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 15.635 | 37.672 | 42% |
| Net Assets | 3.92B | 5.01M | 78,266% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 81.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 1.07 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 17 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 77% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 70% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 66% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.75% | ||
More | ||||
IPOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and SPG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and SPG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | +2.31% | ||
| SPG - IPOS | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ARIS - IPOS | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| BPPTU - IPOS | 0% Poorly correlated | +7.99% |