Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs IPOS
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs IPOS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$30.25
Change+$0.09 (+0.30%)
Volume$2.26K
Net Assets4.36B
Renaissance International IPO ETF
Price$16.37
Change+$0.26 (+1.61%)
Volume$1.74K
Net Assets4.95M
CGXU vs IPOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. IPOS commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Buy and IPOS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 4.36B vs. IPOS (4.95M). IPOS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: IPOS (35.459) vs CGXU (23.584). CGXU was incepted earlier than IPOS: CGXU (4 years) vs IPOS (11 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than IPOS (0.80). IPOS has a higher turnover CGXU (53.00) vs CGXU (53.00).
| CGXU | IPOS | CGXU / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 23.584 | 35.459 | 67% |
| Net Assets | 4.36B | 4.95M | 88,121% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 81.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 1.30 | 1.01 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 75% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 68% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.67% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||
IPOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and ARIS have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and ARIS's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ARIS - IPOS | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SPG - IPOS | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| BPPTU - IPOS | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.42% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||