Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs EAFG
CGXU vs EAFG Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs EAFG
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$27.09
Change-$0.12 (-0.44%)
Volume$512.46K
Net Assets3.75B
Pacer Developed Mkts Csh Cow Gr Ldr ETF
Price$21.58
Change-$0.11 (-0.51%)
Volume$937
Net Assets2.69M
CGXU vs EAFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. EAFG commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and EAFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.75B vs. EAFG (2.69M). EAFG has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: EAFG (14.881) vs CGXU (11.004). CGXU was incepted earlier than EAFG: CGXU (3 years) vs EAFG (1 year). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than EAFG (0.65). CGXU has a higher turnover EAFG (33.00) vs EAFG (33.00).
| CGXU | EAFG | CGXU / EAFG | |
| Gain YTD | 11.004 | 14.881 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 3.75B | 2.69M | 139,279% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 33.00 | 109% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 1.26 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | EAFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 72% Closely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 66% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| RIO - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| SE - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
EAFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EAFG and SAP have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAFG and SAP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EAFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAFG | 100% | N/A | ||
| SAP - EAFG | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| ROG - EAFG | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.50% | ||
| RIO - EAFG | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| BHP - EAFG | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SAN - EAFG | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||