78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs XYL
CGW vs XYL Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs XYL
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.28
Change-$0.31 (-0.48%)
Volume$12.19K
Net Assets1.02B
Xylem
Price$140.81
Change-$1.03 (-0.73%)
Volume$765.1K
Capitalization34.27B
CGW vs XYL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. XYL commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and XYL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XYL: Fundamental Ratings
XYL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | XYL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 29% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with HTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then HTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 66% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| XYL - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
XYL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XYL has been closely correlated with GGG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XYL jumps, then GGG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y