Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs XLB
CGW vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs XLB
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.35
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Volume$419
Net Assets1.01B
The Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$91.50
Change-$0.46 (-0.50%)
Volume$1.45K
Net Assets5.58B
CGW vs XLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. XLB commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and XLB is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.58B vs. CGW (1.01B). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than XLB: CGW (18.764) vs XLB (10.374). CGW was incepted earlier than XLB: CGW (18 years) vs XLB (27 years). XLB (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than CGW (0.59). CGW has a higher turnover XLB (13.00) vs XLB (13.00).
| CGW | XLB | CGW / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | 18.764 | 10.374 | 181% |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 5.58B | 18% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.08 | 737% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 13.00 | 323% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 1.85 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with HTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then HTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 66% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| XYL - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y