Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs XLB
CGW vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs XLB
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.32
Change-$0.36 (-0.56%)
Volume$20.79K
Net Assets1.01B
The Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$87.57
Change-$0.58 (-0.66%)
Volume$8.97M
Net Assets5.3B
CGW vs XLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. XLB commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and XLB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.3B vs. CGW (1.01B). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than XLB: CGW (18.672) vs XLB (6.299). CGW was incepted earlier than XLB: CGW (19 years) vs XLB (27 years). XLB (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than CGW (0.59). CGW has a higher turnover XLB (13.00) vs XLB (13.00).
| CGW | XLB | CGW / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | 18.672 | 6.299 | 296% |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 5.3B | 19% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.08 | 737% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 13.00 | 323% |
| Yield | 1.09 | 2.01 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| WTS - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y