Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs PHO
CGW vs PHO Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs PHO
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.57
Change+$0.31 (+0.48%)
Volume$14.26K
Net Assets1B
Invesco Water Resources ETF
Price$72.41
Change+$0.33 (+0.46%)
Volume$150
Net Assets2.14B
CGW vs PHO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. PHO commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and PHO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHO has more net assets: 2.14B vs. CGW (1B). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than PHO: CGW (18.561) vs PHO (10.042). CGW was incepted earlier than PHO: CGW (19 years) vs PHO (20 years). CGW (0.59) and PHO (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . CGW has a higher turnover PHO (25.00) vs PHO (25.00).
| CGW | PHO | CGW / PHO | |
| Gain YTD | 18.561 | 10.042 | 185% |
| Net Assets | 1B | 2.14B | 47% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 25.00 | 168% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 0.54 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 76% | 14 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| WTS - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||
PHO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHO has been closely correlated with PNR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHO jumps, then PNR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y