Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs PHO
CGW vs PHO Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs PHO
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$66.16
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.04B
Invesco Water Resources ETF
Price$73.01
Change+$0.73 (+1.01%)
Volume$321
Net Assets2.14B
CGW vs PHO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. PHO commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and PHO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHO has more net assets: 2.14B vs. CGW (1.04B). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than PHO: CGW (4.632) vs PHO (2.657). CGW was incepted earlier than PHO: CGW (19 years) vs PHO (20 years). CGW (0.59) and PHO (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . PHO has a higher turnover CGW (19.00) vs CGW (19.00).
| CGW | PHO | CGW / PHO | |
| Gain YTD | 4.632 | 2.657 | 174% |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 2.14B | 49% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 25.00 | 76% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 0.53 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.97% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| PNR - CGW | 62% Loosely correlated | -10.16% | ||
More | ||||
PHO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHO has been closely correlated with PNR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHO jumps, then PNR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHO | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| PNR - PHO | 83% Closely correlated | -10.16% | ||
| FELE - PHO | 79% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| WTS - PHO | 79% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| FERG - PHO | 73% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ACM - PHO | 73% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||