Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs PHO
CGW vs PHO Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs PHO
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$63.51
Change-$0.15 (-0.24%)
Volume$51K
Net Assets988.22M
Invesco Water Resources ETF
Price$71.73
Change-$0.03 (-0.04%)
Volume$32.86K
Net Assets2.13B
CGW vs PHO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. PHO commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and PHO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHO has more net assets: 2.13B vs. CGW (988M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than PHO: CGW (17.461) vs PHO (9.507). CGW was incepted earlier than PHO: CGW (19 years) vs PHO (20 years). CGW (0.59) and PHO (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . CGW has a higher turnover PHO (25.00) vs PHO (25.00).
| CGW | PHO | CGW / PHO | |
| Gain YTD | 17.461 | 9.507 | 184% |
| Net Assets | 988M | 2.13B | 46% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 25.00 | 168% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 0.54 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSVUX | 16.41 | 0.07 | +0.43% |
| Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value R6 | |||
| RAFCX | 43.57 | 0.12 | +0.28% |
| American Funds AMCAP R3 | |||
| FDTCX | 33.23 | 0.09 | +0.27% |
| Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock C | |||
| HLFMX | 8.95 | N/A | N/A |
| Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inst | |||
| RINYX | 49.49 | N/A | N/A |
| Russell Inv International Devd Mkts Y | |||
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| WTS - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
More | ||||
PHO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHO has been closely correlated with PNR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHO jumps, then PNR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y