Intraday BUY SELL Signals
104 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs HTO
CGW vs HTO Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs HTO
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.32
Change-$0.36 (-0.56%)
Volume$20.79K
Net Assets1.01B
CGW vs HTO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. HTO commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Buy and HTO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HTO: Fundamental Ratings
HTO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | HTO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 25 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| WTS - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||
HTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTO has been closely correlated with CWT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTO jumps, then CWT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTO | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| CWT - HTO | 81% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| AWR - HTO | 81% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| YORW - HTO | 74% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| WTRG - HTO | 74% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| MSEX - HTO | 69% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||