Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs GNR
CGW vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs GNR
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$63.51
Change-$0.15 (-0.24%)
Volume$51K
Net Assets990.12M
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$62.69
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
Volume$157.55K
Net Assets3.84B
CGW vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. GNR commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and GNR is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.84B vs. CGW (990M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGW: GNR (27.804) vs CGW (17.177). CGW was incepted earlier than GNR: CGW (19 years) vs GNR (15 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than CGW (0.59). CGW has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| CGW | GNR | CGW / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 17.177 | 27.804 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 990M | 3.84B | 26% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 15.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 3.48 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 13 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| WTS - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y