Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs GNR
CGW vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs GNR
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.32
Change-$0.36 (-0.56%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.01B
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$60.34
Change-$0.58 (-0.95%)
Volume$369
Net Assets3.57B
CGW vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. GNR commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Buy and GNR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.57B vs. CGW (1.01B). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGW: GNR (24.196) vs CGW (19.336). CGW was incepted earlier than GNR: CGW (19 years) vs GNR (15 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than CGW (0.59). CGW has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| CGW | GNR | CGW / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 19.336 | 24.196 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 3.57B | 28% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 15.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 1.09 | 3.61 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 76% | 10 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| WTS - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y