Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs GNR
CGW vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs GNR
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.28
Change-$0.31 (-0.48%)
Volume$12.19K
Net Assets1.02B
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$56.15
Change+$0.23 (+0.41%)
Volume$118.34K
Net Assets3.19B
CGW vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. GNR commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and GNR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.19B vs. CGW (1.02B). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: CGW (18.598) vs GNR (14.471). CGW was incepted earlier than GNR: CGW (18 years) vs GNR (15 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than CGW (0.59). CGW has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| CGW | GNR | CGW / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 18.598 | 14.471 | 129% |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 3.19B | 32% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 15.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 1.12 | 3.90 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 17 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with HTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then HTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 66% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| XYL - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y