Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$63.25
Change+$0.64 (+1.02%)
Volume$21.73K
Net Assets990.87M
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$29.27
Change+$0.12 (+0.41%)
Volume$2.55K
Net Assets42.28M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a StrongBuy and CUT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 991M vs. CUT (42.3M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (16.697) vs CUT (-7.559). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (18 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CGW has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 16.697 | -7.559 | -221% |
| Net Assets | 991M | 42.3M | 2,343% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 3.11 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with HTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then HTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 66% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| WTS - CGW | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and PACK have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and PACK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.32% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
| IP - CUT | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLW - CUT | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
| MERC - CUT | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
More | ||||