Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.98
Change+$0.38 (+0.59%)
Volume$21.14K
Net Assets999.31M
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.44
Change+$0.17 (+0.60%)
Volume$1.67K
Net Assets41.13M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and CUT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 999M vs. CUT (41.1M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (19.887) vs CUT (-10.196). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (18 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CGW has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 19.887 | -10.196 | -195% |
| Net Assets | 999M | 41.1M | 2,431% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 3.26 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| WTS - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and PACK have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and PACK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | -7.25% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| IP - CUT | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CLW - CUT | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||