Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$63.51
Change-$0.15 (-0.24%)
Volume$51K
Net Assets988.22M
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.92
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
Volume$200
Net Assets37.43M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a StrongBuy and CUT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 988M vs. CUT (37.4M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (17.461) vs CUT (-8.864). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (19 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CGW has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 17.461 | -8.864 | -197% |
| Net Assets | 988M | 37.4M | 2,642% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 3.34 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| WTS - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||