Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$66.16
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.04B
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.91
Change+$1.07 (+3.59%)
Volume$217
Net Assets37.19M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and CUT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 1.04B vs. CUT (37.2M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (4.632) vs CUT (2.691). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (19 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover CGW (19.00) vs CGW (19.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 4.632 | 2.691 | 172% |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 37.2M | 2,801% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 26.00 | 73% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 2.40 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.97% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| PNR - CGW | 62% Loosely correlated | -10.16% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with SLVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then SLVM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IP - CUT | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.37% | ||
| CLW - CUT | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
More | ||||