Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.37
Change+$0.61 (+0.96%)
Volume$24.9K
Net Assets1.01B
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.99
Change+$0.41 (+1.34%)
Volume$3.48K
Net Assets44.3M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and CUT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 1.01B vs. CUT (44.3M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (18.764) vs CUT (-2.123). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (18 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CGW has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 18.764 | -2.123 | -884% |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 44.3M | 2,275% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 3.11 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with HTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then HTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 66% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| XYL - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and AMCR have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and AMCR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
| GPK - CUT | 14% Poorly correlated | +3.01% | ||
| MERC - CUT | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| AVY - CUT | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| SON - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||