Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.28
Change-$0.31 (-0.48%)
Volume$12.19K
Net Assets1.02B
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.59
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
Volume$334
Net Assets46.29M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and CUT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 1.02B vs. CUT (46.3M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (18.598) vs CUT (-3.400). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (18 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CGW has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 18.598 | -3.400 | -547% |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 46.3M | 2,201% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.12 | 3.28 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with HTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then HTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 66% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| XYL - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and AMCR have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and AMCR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| GPK - CUT | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| MERC - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| SON - CUT | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| AVY - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
More | ||||