CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
Gain YTD | 14.889 | -0.416 | -3,577% |
Net Assets | 983M | 48.3M | 2,035% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
Yield | 1.11 | 3.21 | 35% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
CGW | CUT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago77% | 12 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with WTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then WTS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CUT | 100% | +1.12% | ||
AMCR - CUT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
WFG - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
SLVM - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
MAGN - CUT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More |