Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$64.32
Change-$0.36 (-0.56%)
Volume$20.79K
Net Assets1.01B
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.57
Change+$0.14 (+0.49%)
Volume$9.02K
Net Assets41.22M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Buy and CUT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 1.01B vs. CUT (41.2M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (18.672) vs CUT (-9.765). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (19 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CGW has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 18.672 | -9.765 | -191% |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 41.2M | 2,439% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.09 | 3.44 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 76% | 18 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with ECL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then ECL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGW | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| ECL - CGW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| FELE - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| VLTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| HTO - CGW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| WTS - CGW | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
More | ||||
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.49% | ||
More | ||||