Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGW vs CUT
CGW vs CUT Comparison
Open Charts CGW vs CUT
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
Price$62.27
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
Volume$14.73K
Net Assets982.65M
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$31.54
Change+$0.35 (+1.12%)
Volume$4.7K
Net Assets48.34M
CGW vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGW vs. CUT commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGW is a Hold and CUT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGW has more net assets: 983M vs. CUT (48.3M). CGW has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: CGW (14.889) vs CUT (-0.416). CGW was incepted earlier than CUT: CGW (18 years) vs CUT (18 years). CGW (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CGW has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 14.889 | -0.416 | -3,577% |
| Net Assets | 983M | 48.3M | 2,035% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 32.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.11 | 3.21 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | 12 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been closely correlated with WTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then WTS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| MAGN - CUT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||