CGV | FYLD | CGV / FYLD | |
Gain YTD | 18.103 | 25.150 | 72% |
Net Assets | 123M | 450M | 27% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.59 | 212% |
Turnover | 103.00 | 52.00 | 198% |
Yield | 3.07 | 4.14 | 74% |
Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
CGV | FYLD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago79% | 4 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago69% | 2 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGV has been loosely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGV jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD | 100% | -0.42% | ||
BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
SHEL - FYLD | 70% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
TTE - FYLD | 70% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
WDS - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
CNQ - FYLD | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More |