Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGV vs FNDC
CGV vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts CGV vs FNDC
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
Price$14.56
Change-$0.12 (-0.82%)
Volume$6.2K
Net Assets120.53M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$44.45
Change-$0.04 (-0.09%)
Volume$200
Net Assets3B
CGV vs FNDC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGV vs. FNDC commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGV is a Buy and FNDC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3B vs. CGV (121M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than CGV: FNDC (30.959) vs CGV (18.743). CGV was incepted earlier than FNDC: CGV (10 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than CGV (1.25). CGV has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| CGV | FNDC | CGV / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 18.743 | 30.959 | 61% |
| Net Assets | 121M | 3B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.39 | 321% |
| Turnover | 103.00 | 33.00 | 312% |
| Yield | 3.13 | 2.61 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGV | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGV has been loosely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGV jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 66% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 66% Loosely correlated | -7.50% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| FER - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||