Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGV vs FNDC
CGV vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts CGV vs FNDC
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
Price$13.76
Change+$0.04 (+0.29%)
Volume$1.66K
Net Assets116.19M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$42.35
Change+$0.10 (+0.24%)
Volume$125.78K
Net Assets2.96B
CGV vs FNDC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGV vs. FNDC commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGV is a Hold and FNDC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.96B vs. CGV (116M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than CGV: FNDC (24.632) vs CGV (11.993). CGV was incepted earlier than FNDC: CGV (9 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than CGV (1.25). CGV has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| CGV | FNDC | CGV / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 11.993 | 24.632 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 116M | 2.96B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.39 | 321% |
| Turnover | 103.00 | 33.00 | 312% |
| Yield | 3.38 | 2.76 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGV | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGV has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGV jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGV | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| APAM - CGV | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| PRU - CGV | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| AESI - CGV | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| ASIX - CGV | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| CNA - CGV | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 71% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| ERO - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| BEN - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| CG - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
More | ||||