CGROF
Price
$3.26
Change
+$0.01 (+0.31%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Capitalization
71.43M
RNDOF
Price
$9.39
Change
-$0.77 (-7.58%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGROF vs RNDOF

Header iconCGROF vs RNDOF Comparison
Open Charts CGROF vs RNDOFBanner chart's image
Character Group
Price$3.26
Change+$0.01 (+0.31%)
Volume$147
Capitalization71.43M
Round One
Price$9.39
Change-$0.77 (-7.58%)
Volume$530
Capitalization2.47B
CGROF vs RNDOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RNDOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGROF vs. RNDOF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGROF is a Hold and RNDOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CGROF: $3.26 vs. RNDOF: $9.39)
Brand notoriety: CGROF and RNDOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGROF: 100% vs. RNDOF: 315%
Market capitalization -- CGROF: $71.43M vs. RNDOF: $2.47B
CGROF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $71.43M. RNDOF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $2.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $40.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGROF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRNDOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGROF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RNDOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RNDOF is a better buy in the long-term than CGROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RNDOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RNDOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CGROF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RNDOF (@Recreational Products) price change was -15.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+2.77% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNDOF($2.47B) has a higher market cap than CGROF($71.4M). RNDOF has higher P/E ratio than CGROF: RNDOF (24.29) vs CGROF (10.08). RNDOF YTD gains are higher at: 11.463 vs. CGROF (0.000).
CGROFRNDOFCGROF / RNDOF
Capitalization71.4M2.47B3%
EBITDAN/A47.2B-
Gain YTD0.00011.463-
P/E Ratio10.0824.2942%
RevenueN/A168B-
Total CashN/A53.7B-
Total DebtN/A98.8B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNDOF: Fundamental Ratings
RNDOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGROFRNDOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RNDOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GFKRF0.04N/A
N/A
Opus One Gold Corp.
PGPKY5.84N/A
N/A
PGE Polska Energetyczna SA
SLOIF37.51N/A
N/A
Soitec, Bernin
LVPA1.01N/A
N/A
Lvpai Group Limited
CRARY9.15-0.07
-0.76%
Credit Agricole SA

CGROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGROF and RNDOF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGROF and RNDOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGROF
1D Price
Change %
CGROF100%
N/A
RNDOF - CGROF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FXLV - CGROF
0%
Poorly correlated
-32.22%
RPNMF - CGROF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPOF - CGROF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
YAMCY - CGROF
-8%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%

RNDOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RNDOF and YAMCY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RNDOF and YAMCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNDOF
1D Price
Change %
RNDOF100%
N/A
YAMCY - RNDOF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
XPOF - RNDOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
RPNMF - RNDOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGROF - RNDOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FXLV - RNDOF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-32.22%