Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFCX
Invesco Comstock Select R
Price$32.90
Change+$0.20 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets782.11M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CGRNX (782M). RMFCX (1.20) and CGRNX (1.16) have matching dividends . CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRNX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. CGRNX (-5.01). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. CGRNX (50.17).
| CGRNX | RMFCX | CGRNX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.105 | 13.689 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 782M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.20 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.01 | 4.96 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.92 | 38.79 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.17 | 57.10 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.37 | 91.18 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement