Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs MNHRX
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHRX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$28.07
Change+$0.23 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.99B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$26.75
Change+$0.21 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.75M
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHRX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. MNHRX (474M). CGQGX (0.47) and MNHRX (0.46) have matching dividends . CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHRX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHRX (15 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.24 vs. MNHRX (5.60). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.09 vs. MNHRX (12.68).
| CGQGX | MNHRX | CGQGX / MNHRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.30 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.036 | 6.701 | 165% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23B | 474M | 4,852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.46 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.24 | 5.60 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.31 | 16.91 | 292% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.09 | 12.68 | 387% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement