Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs MNHRX
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHRX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$30.80
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.9B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.65
Change+$0.09 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.61M
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHRX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. MNHRX (456M). MNHRX (0.45) and CGQGX (0.43) have matching dividends . CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHRX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHRX (16 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. MNHRX (0.51). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 37.53 vs. MNHRX (-1.94).
| CGQGX | MNHRX | CGQGX / MNHRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.30 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.835 | 2.314 | 944% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 456M | 5,461% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.45 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.85 | 0.51 | 2,523% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.81 | 27.09 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.53 | -1.94 | -1,936% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers