Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs MNHCX
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$29.70
Change-$0.59 (-1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.95B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$26.97
Change-$0.27 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets452.67M
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. MNHCX (453M). CGQGX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: CGQGX (0.43) vs MNHCX (0.19). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHCX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHCX (16 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.90 vs. MNHCX (0.34). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 38.11 vs. MNHCX (-4.88).
| CGQGX | MNHCX | CGQGX / MNHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.82 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.82 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.484 | 9.222 | 190% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 453M | 5,497% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.19 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.90 | 0.34 | 2,889% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.02 | 18.09 | 288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.11 | -4.88 | -782% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers