Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs MNHCX
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$29.68
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.44B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$26.63
Change+$0.11 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets452.77M
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 24.4B vs. MNHCX (453M). CGQGX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: CGQGX (0.44) vs MNHCX (0.19). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHCX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHCX (16 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. MNHCX (-0.07). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.42 vs. MNHCX (-3.78).
| CGQGX | MNHCX | CGQGX / MNHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.82 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.82 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.405 | 6.776 | 257% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.4B | 453M | 5,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.19 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | -0.07 | -17,129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.68 | 23.62 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.42 | -3.78 | -1,097% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers