Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs MNHCX
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$26.67
Change-$0.35 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.83B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.58
Change-$0.40 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets458.04M
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. MNHCX (458M). CGQGX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: CGQGX (0.50) vs MNHCX (0.20). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHCX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHCX (15 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. MNHCX (2.44). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 48.44 vs. MNHCX (3.29).
| CGQGX | MNHCX | CGQGX / MNHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.82 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.82 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.498 | 2.566 | 214% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8B | 458M | 4,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.20 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.35 | 2.44 | 301% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.43 | 15.40 | 288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.44 | 3.29 | 1,471% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -11.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement