Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs EXHAX
CGQGX vs EXHAX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs EXHAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$26.67
Change-$0.35 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.83B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.70
Change-$0.41 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets458.04M
CGQGX vs EXHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. EXHAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and EXHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. EXHAX (458M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than CGQGX: EXHAX (0.61) vs CGQGX (0.50). CGQGX was incepted earlier than EXHAX: CGQGX (7 years) vs EXHAX (30 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: CGQGX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. EXHAX (3.21). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 48.44 vs. EXHAX (22.07).
| CGQGX | EXHAX | CGQGX / EXHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.10 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.10 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.498 | 2.882 | 191% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8B | 458M | 4,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.61 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.35 | 3.21 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.43 | 17.89 | 248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.44 | 22.07 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement