Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs TSALX
CGPFX vs TSALX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs TSALX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$28.91
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.6B
Nuveen Lifestyle Aggressive Gr A
Price$22.17
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.91M
CGPFX vs TSALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. TSALX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and TSALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. TSALX (261M). TSALX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: TSALX (1.28) vs CGPFX (0.55). CGPFX was incepted earlier than TSALX: CGPFX (13 years) vs TSALX (14 years). TSALX (1.05) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSALX: CGPFX (250) vs TSALX (2500). CGPFX (13.69) and TSALX (13.20) have marching annual gain over last year. CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. TSALX (39.88).
| CGPFX | TSALX | CGPFX / TSALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.05 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.551 | 12.367 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 261M | 9,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.28 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.69 | 13.20 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.43 | 34.10 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.36 | 39.88 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.71 | 67.81 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement