Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs QNTAX
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs QNTAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$30.63
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.9B
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$41.30
Change+$0.07 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.64M
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. QNTAX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and QNTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. QNTAX (41.6M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: QNTAX (0.74) vs CGPFX (0.51). CGPFX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: CGPFX (14 years) vs QNTAX (9 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: CGPFX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.89 vs. QNTAX (-2.55). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.81 vs. QNTAX (24.11).
| CGPFX | QNTAX | CGPFX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.55 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.55 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.149 | 19.282 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 41.6M | 59,856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.74 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.89 | -2.55 | -427% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.59 | 22.90 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.81 | 24.11 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement