Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs QNTAX
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs QNTAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$29.36
Change-$0.84 (-2.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$38.80
Change-$1.72 (-4.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. QNTAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and QNTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. QNTAX (42.1M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: QNTAX (0.76) vs CGPFX (0.50). CGPFX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: CGPFX (14 years) vs QNTAX (9 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.79). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: CGPFX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. QNTAX (11.27). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.56 vs. QNTAX (10.10).
| CGPFX | QNTAX | CGPFX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.55 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.55 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.137 | 2.276 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 42.1M | 59,620% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.76 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | 11.27 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.34 | 8.80 | 606% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.56 | 10.10 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers