Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs QNTAX
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs QNTAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$29.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.44B
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$40.21
Change+$0.13 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.58M
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. QNTAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and QNTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 24.4B vs. QNTAX (40.6M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: QNTAX (0.75) vs CGPFX (0.52). CGPFX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: CGPFX (13 years) vs QNTAX (9 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: CGPFX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.60 vs. QNTAX (-2.35). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.99 vs. QNTAX (35.85).
| CGPFX | QNTAX | CGPFX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.55 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.55 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.439 | 16.331 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.4B | 40.6M | 60,099% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.75 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.60 | -2.35 | -493% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.12 | 31.61 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.99 | 35.85 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement