Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs EXHAX
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs EXHAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$29.36
Change-$0.84 (-2.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.45
Change-$1.62 (-5.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets451.15M
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. EXHAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and EXHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. EXHAX (451M). CGPFX pays higher dividends than EXHAX: CGPFX (0.50) vs EXHAX (0.41). CGPFX was incepted earlier than EXHAX: CGPFX (14 years) vs EXHAX (30 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.79). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: CGPFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. EXHAX (-1.21). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.56 vs. EXHAX (-0.20).
| CGPFX | EXHAX | CGPFX / EXHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.10 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.10 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.137 | 0.712 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 451M | 5,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.41 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -1.21 | -995% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.34 | 17.77 | 300% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.56 | -0.20 | -12,157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.95 | 59.58 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement