Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs EXHAX
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs EXHAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$31.03
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.9B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.55
Change+$0.08 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.15M
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. EXHAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and EXHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. EXHAX (454M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: EXHAX (0.57) vs CGPFX (0.51). CGPFX was incepted earlier than EXHAX: CGPFX (14 years) vs EXHAX (30 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: CGPFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. EXHAX (0.47). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.06 vs. EXHAX (3.96).
| CGPFX | EXHAX | CGPFX / EXHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.10 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.10 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.877 | 2.282 | 959% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 454M | 5,485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.57 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 0.47 | 2,749% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.30 | 27.60 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.06 | 3.96 | 961% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.45 | 46.70 | 269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers