Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPAX vs MNHRX
CGPAX vs MNHRX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs MNHRX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529A
Price$28.11
Change+$0.24 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.99B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$26.75
Change+$0.21 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.75M
CGPAX vs MNHRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. MNHRX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and MNHRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. MNHRX (474M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: MNHRX (0.46) vs CGPAX (0.38). CGPAX was incepted earlier than MNHRX: CGPAX (13 years) vs MNHRX (15 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CGPAX (0.77). CGPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: CGPAX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). CGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. MNHRX (5.60). CGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.99 vs. MNHRX (12.68).
| CGPAX | MNHRX | CGPAX / MNHRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.30 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.30 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.975 | 6.701 | 164% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23B | 474M | 4,852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.46 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.17 | 5.60 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.69 | 16.91 | 288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.99 | 12.68 | 378% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.13 | 13.47 | 661% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers