Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPAX vs MNHIX
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs MNHIX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529A
Price$28.11
Change+$0.24 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.99B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term I
Price$26.85
Change+$0.21 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.75M
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. MNHIX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and MNHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. MNHIX (474M). MNHIX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: MNHIX (0.71) vs CGPAX (0.38). CGPAX was incepted earlier than MNHIX: CGPAX (13 years) vs MNHIX (17 years). MNHIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than CGPAX (0.77). CGPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHIX: CGPAX (250) vs MNHIX (1000000). CGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. MNHIX (6.09). CGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.99 vs. MNHIX (7.24).
| CGPAX | MNHIX | CGPAX / MNHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.86 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.975 | 6.972 | 157% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23B | 474M | 4,852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.71 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.17 | 6.09 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.69 | 18.65 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.99 | 7.24 | 663% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.13 | -1.28 | -6,959% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers