Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPAX vs MNHIX
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs MNHIX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529A
Price$29.72
Change-$0.59 (-1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.95B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term I
Price$27.37
Change-$0.28 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets452.67M
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. MNHIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and MNHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. MNHIX (453M). MNHIX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: MNHIX (0.68) vs CGPAX (0.35). CGPAX was incepted earlier than MNHIX: CGPAX (14 years) vs MNHIX (18 years). MNHIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than CGPAX (0.77). CGPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHIX: CGPAX (250) vs MNHIX (1000000). CGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. MNHIX (0.46). CGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.04 vs. MNHIX (-2.83).
| CGPAX | MNHIX | CGPAX / MNHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.86 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.331 | 9.044 | 192% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 453M | 5,497% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.68 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.79 | 0.46 | 2,137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.36 | 21.74 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.04 | -2.83 | -1,310% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.12 | 4.87 | 2,179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers