Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGO vs ETO
CGO vs ETO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGO vs. ETO commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGO is a Buy and ETO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ETO has more net assets: 524M vs. CGO (123M). ETO has a higher annual dividend yield than CGO: ETO (24.467) vs CGO (8.316). CGO was incepted earlier than ETO: CGO (20 years) vs ETO (22 years). ETO (1.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGO (1.61). CGO has a higher turnover ETO (67.00) vs ETO (67.00).
| CGO | ETO | CGO / ETO | |
| Gain YTD | 8.316 | 24.467 | 34% |
| Net Assets | 123M | 524M | 23% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.15 | 140% |
| Turnover | 143.00 | 67.00 | 213% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 2.53 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGO | ETO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGO and BAC have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGO and BAC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGO | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| BAC - CGO | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| AAPL - CGO | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| MSFT - CGO | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| LLY - CGO | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| NVO - CGO | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||
ETO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ETO and AAPL have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ETO and AAPL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ETO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETO | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| AAPL - ETO | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| NVDA - ETO | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| MSFT - ETO | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| GOOG - ETO | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.00% | ||
| AMZN - ETO | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||