CGNMF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
857.81M
SVMLF
Price
$0.46
Change
+$0.01 (+2.22%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
190.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGNMF vs SVMLF

Header iconCGNMF vs SVMLF Comparison
Open Charts CGNMF vs SVMLFBanner chart's image
CGN MINING
Price$0.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.22K
Capitalization857.81M
Sovereign Metals
Price$0.46
Change+$0.01 (+2.22%)
Volume$84.01K
Capitalization190.01M
CGNMF vs SVMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGNMF vs. SVMLF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGNMF is a Hold and SVMLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CGNMF: $0.30 vs. SVMLF: $0.46)
Brand notoriety: CGNMF and SVMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGNMF: 21% vs. SVMLF: 92%
Market capitalization -- CGNMF: $857.81M vs. SVMLF: $190.01M
CGNMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $857.81M. SVMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $190.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGNMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGNMF is a better buy in the long-term than SVMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGNMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVMLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGNMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SVMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGNMF is a better buy in the short-term than SVMLF.

Price Growth

CGNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SVMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.43% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGNMF($858M) has a higher market cap than SVMLF($190M). CGNMF YTD gains are higher at: 45.243 vs. SVMLF (2.210). CGNMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 623M vs. SVMLF (-14.49M). CGNMF has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. SVMLF (2.37M).
CGNMFSVMLFCGNMF / SVMLF
Capitalization858M190M452%
EBITDA623M-14.49M-4,299%
Gain YTD45.2432.2102,047%
P/E Ratio11.95N/A-
Revenue4.43BN/A-
Total Cash1.27B2.37M53,784%
Total Debt2.27BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGNMFSVMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVGCX14.970.19
+1.29%
Calamos Growth C
RDCCX8.410.06
+0.72%
Columbia Disciplined Value C
TCLCX22.590.15
+0.67%
Nuveen Large Cap Value A
FAPKX12.730.07
+0.55%
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future C
RPEAX41.060.15
+0.37%
Davis Opportunity A

CGNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGNMF and BRIOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGNMF and BRIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGNMF
1D Price
Change %
CGNMF100%
N/A
BRIOF - CGNMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUEMF - CGNMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+18.06%
AZMCF - CGNMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
BLIDF - CGNMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTSRF - CGNMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
More

SVMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVMLF and VRRCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVMLF and VRRCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVMLF
1D Price
Change %
SVMLF100%
+2.78%
VRRCF - SVMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGNMF - SVMLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMMCF - SVMLF
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.29%
CAMLF - SVMLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
METOF - SVMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.90%
More