Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGMS vs PYLD
CGMS vs PYLD Comparison
Open Charts CGMS vs PYLD
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Inc ETF
Price$27.67
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
Volume$591.24K
Net Assets2.95B
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
Price$26.43
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$1.14M
Net Assets6.53B
CGMS vs PYLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGMS vs. PYLD commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMS is a Hold and PYLD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYLD has more net assets: 6.53B vs. CGMS (2.95B). PYLD has a higher annual dividend yield than CGMS: PYLD (4.862) vs CGMS (4.225). CGMS was incepted earlier than PYLD: CGMS (3 years) vs PYLD (2 years). CGMS (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than PYLD (0.69). PYLD has a higher turnover CGMS (39.00) vs CGMS (39.00).
| CGMS | PYLD | CGMS / PYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 4.225 | 4.862 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 6.53B | 45% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.69 | 57% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 398.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 5.71 | 5.88 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGMS | PYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 23% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 28% | 3 days ago 23% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 28% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 20 days ago 38% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EWV | 31.24 | 0.64 | +2.09% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | |||
| DVOL | 34.73 | 0.13 | +0.38% |
| FirstTrustDorseyWrightMomt&LwVolatil ETF | |||
| VTEC | 96.70 | 0.09 | +0.09% |
| Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | |||
| PUTW | 30.15 | N/A | N/A |
| WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund | |||
| MFUT | 14.87 | -0.04 | -0.25% |
| Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF | |||
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A |