Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGMS vs PYLD
CGMS vs PYLD Comparison
Open Charts CGMS vs PYLD
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Inc ETF
Price$27.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$402.6K
Net Assets2.86B
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
Price$26.34
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
Volume$384
Net Assets5.94B
CGMS vs PYLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGMS vs. PYLD commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMS is a Hold and PYLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYLD has more net assets: 5.94B vs. CGMS (2.86B). PYLD has a higher annual dividend yield than CGMS: PYLD (4.683) vs CGMS (3.999). CGMS was incepted earlier than PYLD: CGMS (3 years) vs PYLD (2 years). CGMS (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than PYLD (0.69). PYLD has a higher turnover CGMS (39.00) vs CGMS (39.00).
| CGMS | PYLD | CGMS / PYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 3.999 | 4.683 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 5.94B | 48% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.69 | 57% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 398.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 5.71 | 5.88 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGMS | PYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 38% | 5 days ago 27% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 40% | 5 days ago 26% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 69% | 26 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 36% | 5 days ago 39% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XCEM | 34.74 | 0.30 | +0.87% |
| Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | |||
| BGDV | 25.55 | 0.18 | +0.71% |
| Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF | |||
| IVRS | 37.34 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF | |||
| XHYT | 34.78 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
| BondBloxx US HY Telecm Md Tech Sctr ETF | |||
| MMT | 4.70 | -0.02 | -0.42% |
| MFS Multimarket Income Trust | |||
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.16% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 16% Poorly correlated | +5.67% |