19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGMS vs NFE
CGMS vs NFE Comparison
Open Charts CGMS vs NFE
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Inc ETF
Price$27.82
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Volume$6.59K
Net Assets3.46B
New Fortress Energy
Price$1.93
Change+$0.12 (+6.63%)
Volume$244.16K
Capitalization515.04M
CGMS vs NFE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGMS vs. NFE commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMS is a Hold and NFE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NFE: Fundamental Ratings
NFE | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGMS | NFE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 15% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KEMX | 35.97 | 0.36 | +1.00% |
| KraneShares MSCI Em Mkts ex CHN ETF | |||
| BWX | 23.03 | 0.17 | +0.74% |
| SPDR® Blmbg Intl Trs Bd ETF | |||
| PQJA | 27.99 | -0.08 | -0.29% |
| PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JANUARY | |||
| YXI | 9.88 | -0.03 | -0.33% |
| ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | |||
| RFG | 50.24 | -0.72 | -1.40% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | |||
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.93% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 18% Poorly correlated | -4.74% |
NFE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFE has been loosely correlated with GLNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFE jumps, then GLNG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NFE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFE | 100% | -4.74% | ||
| GLNG - NFE | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| KNTK - NFE | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| VNOM - NFE | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| BIPC - NFE | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.38% | ||
| OKE - NFE | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
More | ||||