Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGMS vs JOJO
CGMS vs JOJO Comparison
Open Charts CGMS vs JOJO
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Inc ETF
Price$27.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$676.99K
Net Assets2.86B
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
Price$15.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$442
Net Assets7.57M
CGMS vs JOJO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGMS vs. JOJO commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMS is a Buy and JOJO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMS has more net assets: 2.86B vs. JOJO (7.58M). JOJO has a higher annual dividend yield than CGMS: JOJO (4.631) vs CGMS (4.037). CGMS was incepted earlier than JOJO: CGMS (3 years) vs JOJO (4 years). CGMS (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than JOJO (1.24). JOJO has a higher turnover CGMS (39.00) vs CGMS (39.00).
| CGMS | JOJO | CGMS / JOJO | |
| Gain YTD | 4.037 | 4.631 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 7.58M | 37,716% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.24 | 31% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 1440.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 5.71 | 4.82 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGMS | JOJO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 16% Poorly correlated | +32.80% |