Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGMS vs JOJO
CGMS vs JOJO Comparison
Open Charts CGMS vs JOJO
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Inc ETF
Price$27.57
Change-$0.10 (-0.36%)
Volume$2.1K
Net Assets3.6B
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
Price$15.46
Change-$0.07 (-0.45%)
Volume$897
Net Assets6.23M
CGMS vs JOJO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGMS vs. JOJO commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMS is a Buy and JOJO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMS has more net assets: 3.6B vs. JOJO (6.23M). JOJO has a higher annual dividend yield than CGMS: JOJO (9.569) vs CGMS (6.620). CGMS was incepted earlier than JOJO: CGMS (3 years) vs JOJO (4 years). CGMS (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than JOJO (1.24). JOJO has a higher turnover CGMS (39.00) vs CGMS (39.00).
| CGMS | JOJO | CGMS / JOJO | |
| Gain YTD | 6.620 | 9.569 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 3.6B | 6.23M | 57,861% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.24 | 31% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 1440.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 6.02 | 4.62 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGMS | JOJO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 37% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DDIV | 40.53 | 0.34 | +0.83% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Div ETF | |||
| BEDZ | 32.78 | N/A | N/A |
| AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | |||
| OBIL | 50.19 | N/A | N/A |
| F/m US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF | |||
| RPV | 100.82 | -0.12 | -0.12% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | |||
| NEWZ | 27.76 | -0.04 | -0.13% |
| EA Series Trust StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF | |||
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.52% |