| CGMS | FSCO | CGMS / FSCO | |
| Gain YTD | 6.620 | 5.465 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 3.6B | 1.41B | 255% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 36.00 | 108% |
| Yield | 6.02 | 8.78 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
| CGMS | FSCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 24 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 37% | 10 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 82% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.52% |