CGMLF
Price
$1.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.55B
SUIFF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.02 (-18.18%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
16.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGMLF vs SUIFF

Header iconCGMLF vs SUIFF Comparison
Open Charts CGMLF vs SUIFFBanner chart's image
Chalice Mining
Price$1.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.74K
Capitalization1.55B
Superior Mining International
Price$0.09
Change-$0.02 (-18.18%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization16.41M
CGMLF vs SUIFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGMLF vs. SUIFF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMLF is a Hold and SUIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CGMLF: $1.20 vs. SUIFF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: CGMLF and SUIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGMLF: 26% vs. SUIFF: 85%
Market capitalization -- CGMLF: $1.55B vs. SUIFF: $16.41M
CGMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.55B. SUIFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $16.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSUIFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SUIFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGMLF is a better buy in the long-term than SUIFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUIFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SUIFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGMLF is a better buy in the short-term than SUIFF.

Price Growth

CGMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.75% price change this week, while SUIFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMLF($1.55B) has a higher market cap than SUIFF($16.4M). CGMLF YTD gains are higher at: 88.189 vs. SUIFF (-28.800). SUIFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -147.3K vs. CGMLF (-70.16M). CGMLF has more cash in the bank: 115M vs. SUIFF (212K). SUIFF has less debt than CGMLF: SUIFF (97.6K) vs CGMLF (349K). CGMLF has higher revenues than SUIFF: CGMLF (125K) vs SUIFF (0).
CGMLFSUIFFCGMLF / SUIFF
Capitalization1.55B16.4M9,445%
EBITDA-70.16M-147.3K47,632%
Gain YTD88.189-28.800-306%
P/E RatioN/A80.65-
Revenue125K0-
Total Cash115M212K54,245%
Total Debt349K97.6K358%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGMLF vs SUIFF: Fundamental Ratings
CGMLF
SUIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
93100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3781
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10052
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUIFF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (96). This means that SUIFF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SUIFF (100). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to SUIFF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SUIFF (100). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to SUIFF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUIFF (81). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUIFF’s over the last 12 months.

SUIFF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGMLF (100). This means that SUIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGMLFSUIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSCIX42.500.30
+0.71%
abrdn US Small Cap Equity Inst
DNSMX22.550.13
+0.58%
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
HWCAX31.000.16
+0.52%
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
HBGIX23.870.09
+0.38%
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IB
FAGCX222.580.74
+0.33%
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps I

CGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMLF and CVVUF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMLF and CVVUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGMLF
1D Price
Change %
CGMLF100%
N/A
CVVUF - CGMLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
PMETF - CGMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
SUIFF - CGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDBMF - CGMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHXMF - CGMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
More

SUIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUIFF and NVAAF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUIFF and NVAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUIFF
1D Price
Change %
SUIFF100%
N/A
NVAAF - SUIFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGMLF - SUIFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMASF - SUIFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
SOUHY - SUIFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
STRPF - SUIFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More