CGMLF
Price
$1.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.55B
PMETF
Price
$3.19
Change
-$0.09 (-2.74%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGMLF vs PMETF

Header iconCGMLF vs PMETF Comparison
Open Charts CGMLF vs PMETFBanner chart's image
Chalice Mining
Price$1.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.74K
Capitalization1.55B
PATRIOT BATTERY METALS
Price$3.19
Change-$0.09 (-2.74%)
Volume$49.42K
Capitalization1.11B
CGMLF vs PMETF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGMLF vs. PMETF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMLF is a Hold and PMETF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CGMLF: $1.20 vs. PMETF: $3.19)
Brand notoriety: CGMLF and PMETF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGMLF: 26% vs. PMETF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CGMLF: $1.55B vs. PMETF: $1.11B
CGMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.55B. PMETF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMETF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMETF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CGMLF and PMETF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMETF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PMETF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMETF is a better buy in the short-term than CGMLF.

Price Growth

CGMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.75% price change this week, while PMETF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +28.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMLF($1.55B) has a higher market cap than PMETF($1.11B). CGMLF YTD gains are higher at: 88.189 vs. PMETF (30.364). PMETF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -11.98M vs. CGMLF (-70.16M). CGMLF has more cash in the bank: 115M vs. PMETF (19.3M). PMETF has less debt than CGMLF: PMETF (40K) vs CGMLF (349K). CGMLF has higher revenues than PMETF: CGMLF (125K) vs PMETF (0).
CGMLFPMETFCGMLF / PMETF
Capitalization1.55B1.11B140%
EBITDA-70.16M-11.98M586%
Gain YTD88.18930.364290%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue125K0-
Total Cash115M19.3M596%
Total Debt349K40K873%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGMLF vs PMETF: Fundamental Ratings
CGMLF
PMETF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9078
SMR RATING
1..100
9390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3735
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10078
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGMLF's Valuation (96) in the null industry is in the same range as PMETF (96). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to PMETF’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (90). This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (93). This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (37). This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (100). This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGMLFPMETF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSCIX42.500.30
+0.71%
abrdn US Small Cap Equity Inst
DNSMX22.550.13
+0.58%
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
HWCAX31.000.16
+0.52%
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
HBGIX23.870.09
+0.38%
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IB
FAGCX222.580.74
+0.33%
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps I

CGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMLF and CVVUF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMLF and CVVUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGMLF
1D Price
Change %
CGMLF100%
N/A
CVVUF - CGMLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
PMETF - CGMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
SUIFF - CGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDBMF - CGMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHXMF - CGMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
More

PMETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMETF has been loosely correlated with PILBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMETF jumps, then PILBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMETF
1D Price
Change %
PMETF100%
-2.83%
PILBF - PMETF
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
MALRY - PMETF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
IVPAF - PMETF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
LYSDY - PMETF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
CSCCF - PMETF
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
More