CGLCF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
26.12M
TDRRF
Price
$0.80
Change
-$0.04 (-4.76%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
305.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGLCF vs TDRRF

Header iconCGLCF vs TDRRF Comparison
Open Charts CGLCF vs TDRRFBanner chart's image
Cassiar Gold
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$27.51K
Capitalization26.12M
TUDOR GOLD CORP NEW
Price$0.80
Change-$0.04 (-4.76%)
Volume$391.71K
Capitalization305.49M
CGLCF vs TDRRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGLCF vs. TDRRF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGLCF is a Hold and TDRRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CGLCF: $0.18 vs. TDRRF: $0.80)
Brand notoriety: CGLCF and TDRRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGLCF: 9% vs. TDRRF: 163%
Market capitalization -- CGLCF: $26.12M vs. TDRRF: $305.49M
CGLCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $26.12M. TDRRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $305.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGLCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTDRRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TDRRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CGLCF and TDRRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGLCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDRRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGLCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TDRRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TDRRF is a better buy in the short-term than CGLCF.

Price Growth

CGLCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.51% price change this week, while TDRRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +12.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6005.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.48% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TDRRF($305M) has a higher market cap than CGLCF($26.1M). TDRRF YTD gains are higher at: 74.115 vs. CGLCF (34.722). TDRRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.27M vs. CGLCF (-7.75M). TDRRF has more cash in the bank: 12.8M vs. CGLCF (1.44M). CGLCF has less debt than TDRRF: CGLCF (0) vs TDRRF (222K). CGLCF (0) and TDRRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CGLCFTDRRFCGLCF / TDRRF
Capitalization26.1M305M9%
EBITDA-7.75M-6.27M124%
Gain YTD34.72274.11547%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.44M12.8M11%
Total Debt0222K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGLCF vs TDRRF: Fundamental Ratings
CGLCF
TDRRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7482
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9694
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TDRRF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CGLCF (48). This means that TDRRF’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TDRRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CGLCF (100). This means that TDRRF’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TDRRF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CGLCF (96). This means that TDRRF’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TDRRF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CGLCF (48). This means that TDRRF’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TDRRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CGLCF (100). This means that TDRRF’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGLCFTDRRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMECF303.946.93
+2.33%
SMC Corp
UMICF16.170.23
+1.44%
Umicore SA
OAKV13.60N/A
N/A
OAK VIEW BANKSHARES INC.
RFNDF1.28N/A
N/A
Rural Funds Group Stapled Securities
DUVNF0.02N/A
-0.92%
Peruvian Metals Corp.

CGLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGLCF has been loosely correlated with STLRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGLCF jumps, then STLRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGLCF
1D Price
Change %
CGLCF100%
-0.38%
STLRF - CGLCF
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.52%
NSUPF - CGLCF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
MAUTF - CGLCF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
RIOFF - CGLCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
MAKOF - CGLCF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
More

TDRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TDRRF and FFMGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDRRF and FFMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDRRF
1D Price
Change %
TDRRF100%
-4.77%
FFMGF - TDRRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
CGLCF - TDRRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
LGDTF - TDRRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
MMRGF - TDRRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.24%
RDGMF - TDRRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More