CGLCF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
28.8M
MAUTF
Price
$3.30
Change
-$0.06 (-1.79%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
79.57M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGLCF vs MAUTF

Header iconCGLCF vs MAUTF Comparison
Open Charts CGLCF vs MAUTFBanner chart's image
Cassiar Gold
Price$0.17
Change+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Volume$72.39K
Capitalization28.8M
Montage Gold
Price$3.30
Change-$0.06 (-1.79%)
Volume$105.32K
Capitalization79.57M
CGLCF vs MAUTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAUTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGLCF vs. MAUTF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGLCF is a StrongBuy and MAUTF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CGLCF: $0.17 vs. MAUTF: $3.27)
Brand notoriety: CGLCF and MAUTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGLCF: 47% vs. MAUTF: 80%
Market capitalization -- CGLCF: $28.8M vs. MAUTF: $79.57M
CGLCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $28.8M. MAUTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $79.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGLCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAUTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAUTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGLCF is a better buy in the long-term than MAUTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGLCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAUTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGLCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MAUTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGLCF is a better buy in the short-term than MAUTF.

Price Growth

CGLCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +12.49% price change this week, while MAUTF (@Precious Metals) price change was +13.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAUTF($79.6M) has a higher market cap than CGLCF($28.8M). MAUTF YTD gains are higher at: 124.041 vs. CGLCF (33.846). CGLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.3M vs. MAUTF (-11.7M). MAUTF has more cash in the bank: 4.25M vs. CGLCF (2.25M). CGLCF (0) and MAUTF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CGLCFMAUTFCGLCF / MAUTF
Capitalization28.8M79.6M36%
EBITDA-3.3M-11.7M28%
Gain YTD33.846124.04127%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.25M4.25M53%
Total Debt108KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGLCF: Fundamental Ratings
CGLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGLCFMAUTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
86%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAUTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

CGLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGLCF has been loosely correlated with STLRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGLCF jumps, then STLRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGLCF
1D Price
Change %
CGLCF100%
+2.57%
STLRF - CGLCF
36%
Loosely correlated
+5.28%
NSUPF - CGLCF
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.57%
APGOF - CGLCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+8.39%
MAUTF - CGLCF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
EQMEF - CGLCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.69%
More

MAUTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAUTF has been loosely correlated with STLRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAUTF jumps, then STLRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAUTF
1D Price
Change %
MAUTF100%
-2.07%
STLRF - MAUTF
35%
Loosely correlated
+5.28%
AYASF - MAUTF
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.20%
SLVRF - MAUTF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
WDOFF - MAUTF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
CGLCF - MAUTF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
More