CGKEY
Price
$9.69
Change
-$0.03 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.56B
CLPHF
Price
$7.90
Change
-$0.51 (-6.06%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
20.56B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGKEY vs CLPHF

Header iconCGKEY vs CLPHF Comparison
Open Charts CGKEY vs CLPHFBanner chart's image
Chugoku Electric Power
Price$9.69
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
Volume$194
Capitalization4.56B
CLP Holdings
Price$7.90
Change-$0.51 (-6.06%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization20.56B
CGKEY vs CLPHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGKEY vs. CLPHF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGKEY is a Hold and CLPHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CGKEY: $9.69 vs. CLPHF: $7.90)
Brand notoriety: CGKEY and CLPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGKEY: 23% vs. CLPHF: 53%
Market capitalization -- CGKEY: $4.56B vs. CLPHF: $20.56B
CGKEY [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $4.56B. CLPHF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $20.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGKEY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGKEY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGKEY is a better buy in the long-term than CLPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLPHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CGKEY (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLPHF (@Electric Utilities) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+1.21% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPHF($20.6B) has a higher market cap than CGKEY($4.56B). CGKEY has higher P/E ratio than CLPHF: CGKEY (286.43) vs CLPHF (166.67). CLPHF YTD gains are higher at: -1.250 vs. CGKEY (-15.587). CLPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. CGKEY (955M). CLPHF has more cash in the bank: 4.25B vs. CGKEY (1.08B). CGKEY has less debt than CLPHF: CGKEY (22.1B) vs CLPHF (59.4B). CLPHF has higher revenues than CGKEY: CLPHF (101B) vs CGKEY (11.5B).
CGKEYCLPHFCGKEY / CLPHF
Capitalization4.56B20.6B22%
EBITDA955M12.2B8%
Gain YTD-15.587-1.2501,247%
P/E Ratio286.43166.67172%
Revenue11.5B101B11%
Total Cash1.08B4.25B25%
Total Debt22.1B59.4B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGKEY vs CLPHF: Fundamental Ratings
CGKEY
CLPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6378
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5293
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
965

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGKEY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHF (96). This means that CGKEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CGKEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHF (100). This means that CGKEY’s stock grew similarly to CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CGKEY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHF (100). This means that CGKEY’s stock grew similarly to CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CGKEY's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHF (78). This means that CGKEY’s stock grew similarly to CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CGKEY's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHF (93). This means that CGKEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGKEYCLPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNDD12.280.07
+0.61%
Quadratic Deflation ETF
LGDX21.790.11
+0.49%
Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF
KARS25.380.08
+0.32%
KraneShares Eltc Vhl and Ft Mbly ETF
BST38.66N/A
N/A
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
MIN2.64-0.01
-0.38%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust

CGKEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGKEY has been loosely correlated with MNTK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGKEY jumps, then MNTK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGKEY
1D Price
Change %
CGKEY100%
N/A
MNTK - CGKEY
55%
Loosely correlated
-6.45%
HE - CGKEY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
CLPHY - CGKEY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGLXY - CGKEY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
CLPHF - CGKEY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPHF and ACEJF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPHF and ACEJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPHF
1D Price
Change %
CLPHF100%
N/A
ACEJF - CLPHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABOIF - CLPHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNABY - CLPHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKISY - CLPHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPHY - CLPHF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More