CGIUF
Price
$2.15
Change
+$0.05 (+2.38%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.73B
SILA
Price
$25.12
Change
+$0.09 (+0.36%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.39B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGIUF vs SILA

Header iconCGIUF vs SILA Comparison
Open Charts CGIUF vs SILABanner chart's image
ESR REIT
Price$2.15
Change+$0.05 (+2.38%)
Volume$2.93K
Capitalization1.73B
Sila Realty Trust
Price$25.12
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
Volume$196.54K
Capitalization1.39B
CGIUF vs SILA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SILA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGIUF vs. SILA commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIUF is a Buy and SILA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CGIUF: $2.15 vs. SILA: $25.12)
Brand notoriety: CGIUF and SILA are both not notable
CGIUF represents the Miscellaneous Manufacturing, while SILA is part of the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGIUF: 145% vs. SILA: 65%
Market capitalization -- CGIUF: $1.73B vs. SILA: $1.39B
CGIUF [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] is valued at $1.73B. SILA’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $1.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $105.98B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $8.32B. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGIUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSILA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SILA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGIUF is a better buy in the long-term than SILA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGIUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SILA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGIUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SILA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CGIUF and SILA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CGIUF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а +2.38% price change this week, while SILA (@Managed Health Care) price change was -2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.83%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

SILA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+0.02% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

@Managed Health Care (-0.35% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGIUF($1.73B) has a higher market cap than SILA($1.39B). CGIUF YTD gains are higher at: 12.624 vs. SILA (8.292). SILA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. CGIUF (61.4M). CGIUF has more cash in the bank: 67.7M vs. SILA (24.8M). SILA has less debt than CGIUF: SILA (620M) vs CGIUF (2.81B). CGIUF has higher revenues than SILA: CGIUF (413M) vs SILA (190M).
CGIUFSILACGIUF / SILA
Capitalization1.73B1.39B125%
EBITDA61.4M137M45%
Gain YTD12.6248.292152%
P/E RatioN/A35.38-
Revenue413M190M217%
Total Cash67.7M24.8M273%
Total Debt2.81B620M453%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGIUF: Fundamental Ratings
CGIUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGIUFSILA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SILA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAMDX24.840.16
+0.65%
FAM Small Cap Institutional
DLCFX17.080.10
+0.59%
Destinations Large Cap Equity I
TROCX32.010.16
+0.50%
Touchstone Non-US Equity I
WMBLX13.910.04
+0.29%
WesMark Balanced
VWILX122.12-0.10
-0.08%
Vanguard International Growth Adm

CGIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGIUF has been loosely correlated with SILA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGIUF jumps, then SILA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGIUF
1D Price
Change %
CGIUF100%
N/A
SILA - CGIUF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
MAPIF - CGIUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNSPF - CGIUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHTH - CGIUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRLOF - CGIUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SILA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILA has been loosely correlated with SELF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SILA jumps, then SELF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILA
1D Price
Change %
SILA100%
+0.36%
SELF - SILA
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
GLPI - SILA
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
CPT - SILA
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
PSA - SILA
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
IRT - SILA
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More