CGIUF
Price
$1.74
Change
+$0.06 (+3.57%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
SGIC
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Jan 29 closing price
Capitalization
53.76K
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGIUF vs SGIC

Header iconCGIUF vs SGIC Comparison
Open Charts CGIUF vs SGICBanner chart's image
ESR REIT
Price$1.74
Change+$0.06 (+3.57%)
Volume$1.26K
Capitalization1.99B
Strategic Rlty Tr
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$2.52K
Capitalization53.76K
CGIUF vs SGIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGIUF vs. SGIC commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIUF is a Hold and SGIC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CGIUF: $1.74 vs. SGIC: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: CGIUF and SGIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGIUF: 21% vs. SGIC: 100%
Market capitalization -- CGIUF: $1.99B vs. SGIC: $53.76K
CGIUF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.99B. SGIC’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $53.76K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGIUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGIC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGIUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGIC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGIC is a better buy in the long-term than CGIUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGIUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CGIUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CGIUF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SGIC (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.28% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGIUF($1.99B) has a higher market cap than SGIC($53.8K). SGIC YTD gains are higher at: 14.286 vs. CGIUF (-9.115). CGIUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 158M vs. SGIC (-8.79M). CGIUF has more cash in the bank: 49.6M vs. SGIC (2.36M). SGIC has less debt than CGIUF: SGIC (18M) vs CGIUF (2.46B). CGIUF has higher revenues than SGIC: CGIUF (392M) vs SGIC (2.68M).
CGIUFSGICCGIUF / SGIC
Capitalization1.99B53.8K3,695,167%
EBITDA158M-8.79M-1,797%
Gain YTD-9.11514.286-64%
P/E Ratio17.57N/A-
Revenue392M2.68M14,627%
Total Cash49.6M2.36M2,104%
Total Debt2.46B18M13,650%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGIUF: Fundamental Ratings
CGIUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGIUFSGIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
13%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCSLX15.850.15
+0.96%
VALIC Company I Small Cap Index
FBALX31.150.14
+0.45%
Fidelity Balanced
ADAVX4.600.01
+0.22%
abrdn Dynamic Dividend A
RRSRX30.170.03
+0.10%
Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs R6
JIGRX52.280.02
+0.04%
Janus Henderson Overseas S

CGIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGIUF has been loosely correlated with SILA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGIUF jumps, then SILA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGIUF
1D Price
Change %
CGIUF100%
N/A
SILA - CGIUF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
MAPIF - CGIUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AOTUF - CGIUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNSPF - CGIUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHTH - CGIUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGIC and KBSR have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGIC and KBSR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGIC
1D Price
Change %
SGIC100%
N/A
KBSR - SGIC
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVPR - SGIC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRLOF - SGIC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGIUF - SGIC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRFIF - SGIC
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More