Advertisement
CGIUF vs LNSPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIUF is a Buy and LNSPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGIUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNSPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CGIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LNSPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGIUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNSPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CGIUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- LNSPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CGIUF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LNSPF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was -0.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.95%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+0.31% weekly)Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
| CGIUF | LNSPF | CGIUF / LNSPF | |
| Capitalization | 1.72B | 6.03B | 28% |
| EBITDA | 61.4M | 468M | 13% |
| Gain YTD | 10.005 | 14.634 | 68% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 11.19 | - |
| Revenue | 413M | 397M | 104% |
| Total Cash | 67.7M | 41.8M | 162% |
| Total Debt | 2.81B | 2.1B | 134% |
CGIUF | LNSPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 34 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGIUF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (29). This means that CGIUF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.
CGIUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (100). This means that CGIUF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.
LNSPF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CGIUF (95). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to CGIUF’s over the last 12 months.
CGIUF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (58). This means that CGIUF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.
LNSPF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CGIUF (100). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to CGIUF’s over the last 12 months.
| CGIUF | LNSPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 27% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 6% | 3 days ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 24% | 3 days ago 33% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 23% | 3 days ago 32% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 31% |
Advertisement
CGIUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGIUF has been loosely correlated with SILA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGIUF jumps, then SILA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGIUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGIUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SILA - CGIUF | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| MAPIF - CGIUF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LNSPF - CGIUF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHTH - CGIUF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FRLOF - CGIUF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
LNSPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSPF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSPF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNSPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNSPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MAPIF - LNSPF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CHTH - LNSPF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CGIUF - LNSPF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NRWRF - LNSPF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
| PRKWF - LNSPF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||