CGIUF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.27 (+14.75%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.76B
LNSPF
Price
$2.69
Change
+$0.10 (+3.86%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGIUF vs LNSPF

Header iconCGIUF vs LNSPF Comparison
Open Charts CGIUF vs LNSPFBanner chart's image
ESR REIT
Price$2.10
Change+$0.27 (+14.75%)
Volume$1.97K
Capitalization1.76B
London & Stamford Property
Price$2.69
Change+$0.10 (+3.86%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization5.66B
CGIUF vs LNSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGIUF vs. LNSPF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIUF is a Hold and LNSPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CGIUF: $2.10 vs. LNSPF: $2.69)
Brand notoriety: CGIUF and LNSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGIUF: 106% vs. LNSPF: 443%
Market capitalization -- CGIUF: $1.76B vs. LNSPF: $5.66B
CGIUF [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] is valued at $1.76B. LNSPF’s [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] market capitalization is $5.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $105.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $8.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGIUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNSPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LNSPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGIUF is a better buy in the long-term than LNSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGIUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNSPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGIUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LNSPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNSPF is a better buy in the short-term than CGIUF.

Price Growth

CGIUF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LNSPF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (-0.06% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNSPF($5.66B) has a higher market cap than CGIUF($1.76B). LNSPF YTD gains are higher at: 19.290 vs. CGIUF (10.005). LNSPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 468M vs. CGIUF (61.4M). CGIUF has more cash in the bank: 67.7M vs. LNSPF (41.8M). LNSPF has less debt than CGIUF: LNSPF (2.1B) vs CGIUF (2.81B). CGIUF (413M) and LNSPF (397M) have equivalent revenues.
CGIUFLNSPFCGIUF / LNSPF
Capitalization1.76B5.66B31%
EBITDA61.4M468M13%
Gain YTD10.00519.29052%
P/E RatioN/A11.77-
Revenue413M397M104%
Total Cash67.7M41.8M162%
Total Debt2.81B2.1B134%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGIUF vs LNSPF: Fundamental Ratings
CGIUF
LNSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10090
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGIUF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (29). This means that CGIUF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (100). This means that CGIUF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CGIUF (96). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to CGIUF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIUF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (52). This means that CGIUF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CGIUF (100). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to CGIUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGIUFLNSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OILD11.970.57
+5.00%
MicroSectorsTM Ol&Gs E&P -3X Inv Lg ETNs
ZJAN26.74N/A
N/A
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January
VFMF143.04-0.28
-0.20%
Vanguard US Multifactor ETF
HUSV39.76-0.14
-0.35%
First Trust Hrzn MgdVolatil Domestic ETF
STEW18.47-0.10
-0.54%
SRH Total Return Fund

CGIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGIUF has been loosely correlated with SILA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGIUF jumps, then SILA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGIUF
1D Price
Change %
CGIUF100%
N/A
SILA - CGIUF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
MAPIF - CGIUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNSPF - CGIUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHTH - CGIUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
FRLOF - CGIUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LNSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSPF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSPF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSPF
1D Price
Change %
LNSPF100%
N/A
MAPIF - LNSPF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHTH - LNSPF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
CGIUF - LNSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRWRF - LNSPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRKWF - LNSPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More