Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGIIX vs FCSDX
CGIIX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts CGIIX vs FCSDX
Calamos Growth & Income I
Price$47.20
Change-$0.48 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.89B
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.06
Change-$0.15 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
CGIIX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIIX vs. FCSDX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIIX is a Buy and FCSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. CGIIX (2.89B). FCSDX pays higher dividends than CGIIX: FCSDX (1.47) vs CGIIX (0.90). CGIIX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: CGIIX (28 years) vs FCSDX (21 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CGIIX (0.80). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGIIX (28.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGIIX: FCSDX (0) vs CGIIX (1000000). CGIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. FCSDX (5.98). CGIIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.43 vs. FCSDX (30.04).
| CGIIX | FCSDX | CGIIX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.520 | 2.829 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 5.13B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.47 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 5.98 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.87 | 19.32 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.43 | 30.04 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.61 | 32.28 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers