Advertisement
CGIFF vs NOPMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIFF is a StrongBuy and NOPMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGIFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNOPMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CGIFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- NOPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGIFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOPMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CGIFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NOPMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CGIFF (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) experienced а +9.57% price change this week, while NOPMF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -1.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.65%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +4.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.24%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (+4.84% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
@Chemicals: Specialty (+4.02% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| CGIFF | NOPMF | CGIFF / NOPMF | |
| Capitalization | 1.01B | 515M | 195% |
| EBITDA | 436M | 20.2M | 2,158% |
| Gain YTD | 17.546 | 123.360 | 14% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.42 | 80.71 | 14% |
| Revenue | 1.84B | 475M | 386% |
| Total Cash | 28.9M | 77.3M | 37% |
| Total Debt | 990M | 75.4M | 1,313% |
CGIFF | NOPMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGIFF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as NOPMF (49). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew similarly to NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.
CGIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOPMF (68). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.
CGIFF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOPMF (92). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.
NOPMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CGIFF (52). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to CGIFF’s over the last 12 months.
CGIFF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as NOPMF (41). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew similarly to NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.
| CGIFF | NOPMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 57% | 18 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
CGIFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGIFF and OEC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGIFF and OEC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGIFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGIFF | 100% | +9.85% | ||
| OEC - CGIFF | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.71% | ||
| SKFOF - CGIFF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| JMPLY - CGIFF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
| SXYAY - CGIFF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| FUPPF - CGIFF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NOPMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOPMF has been loosely correlated with OCLDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOPMF jumps, then OCLDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOPMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOPMF | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| OCLDF - NOPMF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CGIFF - NOPMF | 22% Poorly correlated | +9.85% | ||
| SXYAY - NOPMF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| HDSN - NOPMF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
| SKFOF - NOPMF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||