CGIFF
Price
$8.15
Change
-$0.05 (-0.61%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
732.14M
CLZNF
Price
$10.99
Change
-$1.37 (-11.08%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
5.38B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGIFF vs CLZNF

Header iconCGIFF vs CLZNF Comparison
Open Charts CGIFF vs CLZNFBanner chart's image
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
Price$8.15
Change-$0.05 (-0.61%)
Volume$237
Capitalization732.14M
Clariant AG
Price$10.99
Change-$1.37 (-11.08%)
Volume$3.91K
Capitalization5.38B
CGIFF vs CLZNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGIFF vs. CLZNF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIFF is a Hold and CLZNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CGIFF: $8.15 vs. CLZNF: $10.99)
Brand notoriety: CGIFF and CLZNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGIFF: 3% vs. CLZNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CGIFF: $732.14M vs. CLZNF: $5.38B
CGIFF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $732.14M. CLZNF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $5.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGIFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCLZNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGIFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CLZNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGIFF is a better buy in the long-term than CLZNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGIFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLZNF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGIFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CLZNF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLZNF is a better buy in the short-term than CGIFF.

Price Growth

CGIFF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while CLZNF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.16% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLZNF($5.38B) has a higher market cap than CGIFF($732M). CLZNF has higher P/E ratio than CGIFF: CLZNF (13.95) vs CGIFF (5.58). CGIFF YTD gains are higher at: 7.751 vs. CLZNF (-13.871). CLZNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 816M vs. CGIFF (565M). CLZNF has more cash in the bank: 617M vs. CGIFF (21.5M). CGIFF has less debt than CLZNF: CGIFF (864M) vs CLZNF (1.55B). CLZNF has higher revenues than CGIFF: CLZNF (4.9B) vs CGIFF (1.85B).
CGIFFCLZNFCGIFF / CLZNF
Capitalization732M5.38B14%
EBITDA565M816M69%
Gain YTD7.751-13.871-56%
P/E Ratio5.5813.9540%
Revenue1.85B4.9B38%
Total Cash21.5M617M3%
Total Debt864M1.55B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGIFF vs CLZNF: Fundamental Ratings
CGIFF
CLZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
5041
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4880
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGIFF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CLZNF (17). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew similarly to CLZNF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLZNF (100). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLZNF’s over the last 12 months.

CLZNF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CGIFF (50). This means that CLZNF’s stock grew similarly to CGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIFF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CLZNF (80). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew similarly to CLZNF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIFF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLZNF (97). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLZNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGIFFCLZNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACTV32.750.15
+0.46%
LeaderShares® Activist Leaders® ETF
THRO36.340.16
+0.44%
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation ActiveETF
GLU17.750.05
+0.29%
Gabelli Utility & Income Trust (The)
PTY13.850.03
+0.22%
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
BAPR45.900.09
+0.20%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Apr

CGIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGIFF and OEC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGIFF and OEC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGIFF
1D Price
Change %
CGIFF100%
-0.61%
OEC - CGIFF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
SKFOF - CGIFF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
JMPLY - CGIFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SXYAY - CGIFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
FUPPF - CGIFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLZNF and ZEOOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLZNF and ZEOOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLZNF
1D Price
Change %
CLZNF100%
N/A
ZEOOF - CLZNF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVYSF - CLZNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
CGIFF - CLZNF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
COIHF - CLZNF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COVTY - CLZNF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
More