Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGIE vs IPOS
CGIE vs IPOS Comparison
Open Charts CGIE vs IPOS
Capital Group International Equity ETF
Price$35.99
Change+$1.91 (+5.60%)
Volume$1.09M
Net Assets1.73B
Renaissance International IPO ETF
Price$18.73
Change+$1.33 (+7.64%)
Volume$2.04K
Net Assets5.69M
CGIE vs IPOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIE vs. IPOS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIE is a Hold and IPOS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGIE has more net assets: 1.73B vs. IPOS (5.69M). IPOS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGIE: IPOS (10.874) vs CGIE (3.360). CGIE was incepted earlier than IPOS: CGIE (2 years) vs IPOS (11 years). CGIE (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than IPOS (0.80). IPOS has a higher turnover CGIE (22.00) vs CGIE (22.00).
| CGIE | IPOS | CGIE / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 3.360 | 10.874 | 31% |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 5.69M | 30,453% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 68.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 1.12 | 0.91 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGIE | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 66% | 22 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGIE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGIE has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGIE jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGIE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGIE | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| BN - CGIE | 68% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| SAP - CGIE | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| NWG - CGIE | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| ASML - CGIE | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| TSM - CGIE | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
More | ||||
IPOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and SPG have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and SPG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| SPG - IPOS | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| BPPTU - IPOS | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +4.03% | ||
| CRC - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.61% | ||
More | ||||