Advertisement
CGHLY vs CRGGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGHLY is a Hold and CRGGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGHLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRGGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CGHLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CRGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGHLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRGGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CGHLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- CRGGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
CGHLY (@Gas Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CRGGF (@Gas Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.62%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Gas Distributors (+0.92% weekly)Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.
| CGHLY | CRGGF | CGHLY / CRGGF | |
| Capitalization | 6.06B | 7.98B | 76% |
| EBITDA | 11B | 11.1B | 99% |
| Gain YTD | 8.972 | -34.803 | -26% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.80 | 13.32 | 81% |
| Revenue | 92.3B | 91.4B | 101% |
| Total Cash | 13.9B | 7B | 199% |
| Total Debt | 60.1B | 14.9B | 403% |
CGHLY | CRGGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGHLY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRGGF (41). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRGGF’s over the last 12 months.
CGHLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRGGF (100). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew similarly to CRGGF’s over the last 12 months.
CRGGF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGHLY (100). This means that CRGGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.
CGHLY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRGGF (83). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRGGF’s over the last 12 months.
CRGGF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CGHLY (53). This means that CRGGF’s stock grew similarly to CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.
| CGHLY | CRGGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 5 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UAE | 18.57 | 0.07 | +0.38% |
| iShares MSCI UAE ETF | |||
| IFEB | 28.52 | 0.07 | +0.25% |
| Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Feb | |||
| UVXY | 18.91 | 0.04 | +0.21% |
| ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures | |||
| EGGS | 40.22 | -0.09 | -0.23% |
| NestYield Total Return Guard ETF | |||
| TMF | 38.12 | -0.71 | -1.83% |
| Direxion Daily 20+ Yr Trsy Bull 3X ETF | |||
CGHLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGHLY and CGHOF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGHLY and CGHOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGHLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGHLY | 100% | N/A | ||
| CGHOF - CGHLY | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BIPC - CGHLY | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
| NI - CGHLY | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
| RGCO - CGHLY | 6% Poorly correlated | +4.30% | ||
| OGS - CGHLY | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||
CRGGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRGGF and RGCO have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRGGF and RGCO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRGGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRGGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RGCO - CRGGF | 10% Poorly correlated | +4.30% | ||
| NFE - CRGGF | 7% Poorly correlated | +6.72% | ||
| NI - CRGGF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
| CGHLY - CRGGF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OGS - CRGGF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||