Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGHGX vs MWFAX
CGHGX vs MWFAX Comparison
Open Charts CGHGX vs MWFAX
American Funds Global Growth ABLE-F-2
Price$27.62
Change+$0.09 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.18B
NYLI Equity ETF Allocation
Price$18.12
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.11M
CGHGX vs MWFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGHGX vs. MWFAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGHGX is a Hold and MWFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGHGX has more cash in the bank: 7.19B vs. MWFAX (134M). MWFAX pays higher dividends than CGHGX: MWFAX (0.97) vs CGHGX (0.75). CGHGX was incepted earlier than MWFAX: CGHGX (5 years) vs MWFAX (5 years). MWFAX (0.82) is less costly to investors than CGHGX (0.56). CGHGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWFAX: CGHGX (250) vs MWFAX (2500). CGHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.87 vs. MWFAX (12.20). MWFAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.31 vs. CGHGX (41.28).
| CGHGX | MWFAX | CGHGX / MWFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.82 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.82 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.429 | 17.282 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.19B | 134M | 5,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.97 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.87 | 12.20 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.86 | 52.84 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.28 | 63.31 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement