Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGGO vs ERTH
CGGO vs ERTH Comparison
Open Charts CGGO vs ERTH
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Price$35.61
Change-$0.61 (-1.68%)
Volume$8.46K
Net Assets8.92B
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
Price$48.12
Change+$0.13 (+0.27%)
Volume$169
Net Assets144.99M
CGGO vs ERTH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGGO vs. ERTH commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGGO is a Hold and ERTH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGGO has more net assets: 8.92B vs. ERTH (145M). CGGO has a higher annual dividend yield than ERTH: CGGO (4.531) vs ERTH (1.717). CGGO was incepted earlier than ERTH: CGGO (4 years) vs ERTH (19 years). CGGO (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than ERTH (0.66). ERTH has a higher turnover CGGO (26.00) vs CGGO (26.00).
| CGGO | ERTH | CGGO / ERTH | |
| Gain YTD | 4.531 | 1.717 | 264% |
| Net Assets | 8.92B | 145M | 6,149% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.66 | 71% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 31.00 | 84% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 1.43 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGGO | ERTH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGO has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGO jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | 100% | -0.98% | ||
| BN - CGGO | 79% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| TSM - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| NVDA - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| BX - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| TEL - CGGO | 72% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||
ERTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERTH has been loosely correlated with FSLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERTH jumps, then FSLR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ERTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERTH | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| FSLR - ERTH | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.68% | ||
| SOL - ERTH | 55% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MAXN - ERTH | 51% Loosely correlated | +17.56% | ||
| XPEV - ERTH | 50% Loosely correlated | +4.06% | ||
| CHPT - ERTH | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.64% | ||
More | ||||